Carranza, Venustiano, 1859-1920; Mexico -- History -- Revolution, 1910-1920; Mexico -- Politics and government -- 1910-1946
Besides the head of the family, every member of the Madero clan had
disowned Francisco I. Madero’s political activities with the exception
of his wife and Don Gustavo. It was a repetition of the story of Joseph
in the Old Testament: F. I. Madero like Joseph was sold out by this
brother’s family. There was a radical wing in the Madero movement
headed by Gustavo Madero which believed that all the peaceful methods
of agitation were useless and that the only successful method of
overthrowing the dictator was to be effected in the same way by which
he had come into power--by revolution.
F. I. Madero insisted on peaceful methods, so Gustavo without informing
his brother went to Paris ostensibly to organize a Mexican Railway of
the Centre. As soon as he cashed the first instalment of the moneys for
the construction ($375,000)[6] he used it to buy arms and ammunition
for the revolution which was certain to burst out in a few months.
In San Luis Potosí, October 5th, 1910, Don F. I. Madero, who by this
time had become convinced of the futility of peaceful propaganda,
wrote the famous Plan. A few days later he was advised that there was
an order for his arrest which would be followed by the application of
the “Ley Fuga.” Disguised as a common laborer he fled into the United
States on October 7th, and went to San Antonio. Some New York papers
had long accounts of his flight and plans, sent by their correspondents
but the news was not published.
The Plan of San Luis Potosí was a direct challenge to Porfirio Diaz,
and it used almost the same slogan which General Diaz had written on
the Plan de la Noria against Juarez and later his Plan de Tuxtepec and
Palo Blanco which was: “Effective suffrage and no re-election.”
A great deal has been published about the great promises of land reform
and distribution of great estates by F. I. Madero and which he could or
would not fulfil.
The exact wording of that famous Article 3d of the Plan has either been
forgotten or misinterpreted. We reproduce the Article:
_Article 3d_: “As a result of the abuses of the lands, numerous small
proprietors, mostly Indians, have been despoiled of their lands by
common consent of the ministry of Fomento or by the decisions of the
Mexican courts. In justice to the old proprietors, they should be given
back lands which have been taken away from them in such an arbitrary
manner. The decisions of the Ministry of Fomento and of the courts
will be subject to revision and it will be demanded of those who acted
in such immoral fashion, to return the land to their original owners,
besides paying them an indemnity. Only in case that the lands should
have passed to a third party before the publication of this plan, will
the original owners receive an indemnity from those whose spoliation
benefitted them.”[7]
Thus it will be seen that the Plan of San Luis Potosí aimed first of
all to destroy the régime which had made the land robbery possible.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account