Carriages & Coaches: Their History & Their EvolutionStraus, Ralph
History
Carriages & Coaches: Their History & Their Evolution
Straus, Ralph
Carriages and carts
Driver, suffers the Squalls of his Horn-making Spouse to alarm
his Dove-like Pusillanimity.”
Such a man, the article goes on to say, would surely be frightened
if he saw a three-master sailing the seas, and he and his kind had
better keep quiet upon a subject of which they appeared so entirely and
pitiably ignorant.
The contest began to embrace wider issues than the mere wheels of
waggons. It took in the whole question of wheeled carriages. It even
went so far as to include a denunciation of the general policy of the
Government, whose legislation, or lack of it, on this vexed question
was, so the light-cart faction maintained, leading directly to an
increase in the price of provisions. Nothing, apparently, was right. If
waggons were constructed on principles which were as bad as they could
be, so were the Stage-coaches, which also were using the public roads,
though some of the controversialists seemed to forget the fact.
“We are desired,” runs a paragraph in the newspapers of this
time, “to inform the Masters of Stage-Coaches, Machines, &c.,
that their present Method of hanging their Carriages high with
a low Fore-Wheel, and the body of the Coach hung forwards with
the Stems of the Box leaning likewise forwards, is all upon a
ridiculous wrong Principle,—the Effect of the Stupidity of
Coachmen and Wheelwrights; that if they pursue the following
Regulations, they will find the same Advantage that the
Nobility and Gentry have already done by adopting this Plan:
Let the fore Wheels be three Feet, six, eight, or ten Inches
high, the Stems of the Box upright, and admit as little Weight
forward as possible upon the low Wheel; the Body of the Coach
to hang low for the Convenience of Passengers, as no Benefit
arises from its Hanging high to the Horses, their Advantage
laying intirely upon the Height of the Fore-Wheels.”
This in its turn was argued. Then came a proposal to tax private
carriages according to the number of horses used, and see whether
such revenue would not counterbalance in some way the increase in the
prices of provisions, which, of course, was following on this eternal
wrangle of the waggons. Also there was more legislation. Some of the
new regulations read curiously. “No tree or bush is to be allowed to
grow or stand within fifteen feet of the center of the highway, on
forfeiture of 10s. by the owner.” Cartways were to be at least twenty
feet wide, and horse causeways three feet wide. No waggon with more
than four horses might have wheels less than nine inches in width,
and some one on horseback or on foot had to go in front of it. More
criticism filled the newspapers, and more inventions appeared.
Meetings were held. One advertisement which appeared in 1767 has an
agreeable air of mystery about it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account