Carrots, mangold wurtzels and sugar beets : $b How to raise them, how to keep them and how to feed themGregory, James J. H. (James John Howard)
Science
Carrots, mangold wurtzels and sugar beets : $b How to raise them, how to keep them and how to feed them
Gregory, James J. H. (James John Howard)
Carrots; Mangel-wurzel; Sugar beet
Of all roots Mangolds are the rankest feeders, removing more plant
food from the soil than any other root crop. The crop of Mr. Albert
Fearing, of Hingham, Mass., was sixty tons of roots, and if the tops
were in the usual proportion, of about one-third, they weighed twenty
tons more, giving the enormous yield of eighty-tons of green food
from one acre of ground. The crop raised on Deer Island, in Boston
harbor, was about seventy tons to the acre; with a like proportion
of tops the total yield must have been over a hundred tons. In the
sewage farms of England eighty tons of roots have been raised on an
acre of ground. Fearing applied fifteen cords of manure to his acre
of ground; of the quantity applied to the Deer Island crop I regret I
have not the data at hand.
If the mere bulk alone was to be aimed at in the crop, the problem
would be a very simple one, but there are three points to be
considered: first, how to get a crop that shall be great in bulk
and at the same time give us the second desirable point, viz.:
_ripeness_, and thus insure the third desirable point, viz.: _the
highest percentage of sugar it is possible for the roots to acquire_.
This matter of the value of Mangolds, for feeding purposes, being in
about the same proportion as the sugar present, though appertaining
to that part of this Treatise which treats of “Feeding to Stock,”
yet has so direct a bearing on the manuring of the crops that I will
take it up at this place. The recent researches of that distinguished
chemist, Prof. Voelcker of England, than whom there is no better
authority, has thrown much light on the question of manure in its
application to this crop. The Professor takes the position that the
nutritious value of roots is in proportion to the amount of dry
matter in them, and that the percentage of sugar present coincides
with that of dry matter, the proportion of sugar rising or falling
with the percentage of dry matter in the roots. That the feeding
value does not depend on the proportion of nitrogen they contain, is
proved theoretically, by the fact that the percentage is very much
higher in the early stages of growth, before the crop is matured,
than it is later in the season, while in the experiments of Mr. Lawes
in feeding sheep, the lot containing the most nitrogen in the way of
nutrition gave the poorest results.
Assuming with Prof. Voelcker that bulk should not be sought at a
disproportionate sacrifice of sugar in the crop, and that certain
soils and certain manures and certain methods of cultivation are
more favorable than others to the development of this desirable
proportion. I present extracts from his valuable article on “Root
Crops as affected by Soil and Manures.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account