Celtic MSS. in relation to the Macpherson fraud: With a review of Professor Freeman's criticism of [P.B. Du Chaillu's] "The Viking Age," by the author of "Celticism a myth"Roger, James Cruikshank
History
Celtic MSS. in relation to the Macpherson fraud: With a review of Professor Freeman's criticism of [P.B. Du Chaillu's] "The Viking Age," by the author of "Celticism a myth"
Roger, James Cruikshank
Celtic literature -- History and criticism; Ossian, active 3rd century
in disclaiming the art that especially belongs to his country surpasses
my comprehension. Let us hear what the _Saturday Review_ has to say on
the subject of Celtic art. Taking exception to many of my positions,
it says: “He [Mr. Roger] is on much firmer ground when he declines
to believe in any art or culture that can fairly be called Celtic.
The very patterns which are usually spoken of as Celtic are common to
all the gold work of the Mycenæan graves, which few people, we think,
will now place much later than 1500 B.C.” “Dr. Schliemann’s Mycenæan
discoveries deprive the Celts of any credit for originality in their
system of spiral ornament.” Again “‘_Celtic_’ patterns certainly
existed on the shores of the Ægean fifteen hundred years before our
era.” “Mr. Roger is probably right when he claims a Scandinavian
origin for the ancient claymores (two handed), for the Tara brooch and
other brooches, for stone crosses, dirk handles, and what so else is
too commonly attributed to Celtic art.” “‘What is Celtic art?’ cries
Mr. Roger, triumphantly. What, indeed? ‘The Celts, Pinkerton tells
us, had no monuments, any more than the Finns or savage Africans, or
Americans.’ As to Americans, Mr. Roger can see their bas-reliefs at
the South Kensington Museum;[4] _but for Celtic art not derived from
the Scandinavians or Romans, we know not where to bid him look_.”
I am content to rest the matter here. There is no art known as
distinctively Celtic, and in this aspect of the question I am confirmed
by the _Saturday Review_. But to return to Professor Freeman. In a
number of the publication called _The Antiquary_, issued on November
16th, 1872, the writer of a paper on _The Landing of the Saxons in
Kent_, tells us that “after pillaging for ‘a hundred and fifty years’
the British shores,” the Jutes, or Saxons, landed under Hengist and
Horsa, “and here,” the writer says, “we must halt for a few moments
till we have disposed of Mr. E. A. Freeman’s astounding statement that
Horsa meant _mare_. Hors, our misspelt _horse_,” the writer says, “is
like its German equivalent Ross, a neuter word. The Saxon hero is
sometimes called simply Hors, but more frequently by the addition of a
masculine termination--a, as in ‘Ida Ælla,’ and some thousands more,
he becomes Horsa, masculine and male. _Mare_ is Myre, feminine.
* * * * If Mr. Freeman will be good enough to tell us how he came to
fall into this preposterous error, we may possibly clear up the cause of
his mistake; for the most part, when he makes a bad blunder, we can
form a notion what better authority has misled him; but in this case
no English dictionary, grammar, or history can have been consulted
by him. Can it have been a Latin grammar? Mr. Freeman is extensively
known as blowing weekly a shrill trumpet, ‘_asper, acerba, sonans_,’
in reviews of literary and illiterate performances, but then he is
in hiding; we hear the obstreperous whirr, but the midge is behind
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account