Celtic Scotland : $b A history of ancient Alban. Volume 1 (of 3), History and ethnologySkene, W. F. (William Forbes)
History
Celtic Scotland : $b A history of ancient Alban. Volume 1 (of 3), History and ethnology
Skene, W. F. (William Forbes)
Celts -- Scotland; Civilization, Celtic; Scotland -- Antiquities, Celtic; Scotland -- History -- To 1603
His object was, by identifying this range with the boundary between
the Picts and Scots, to extend the territories of the latter, and by
applying to it the name of Tacitus’s Mons Grampius he has stamped upon
it ever since the appellation of the Grampians. But the older
authorities know nothing of the Grampians, and never mention this
range of mountains. They only specify the mountain ranges of the
Mounth and Drumalban. Thus the Tract de Situ Albaniae (_Chron. Picts
and Scots_, p. 135) mentions the ‘mons qui Mound vocatur, qui a mari
occidentali usque ad mare orientale extenditur.’ And another
description (_ib._ p. 214) has, ‘Et itaque est quoddam vastum quod
vocatur le Mounth, ubi est pessimum passagium sine cibo, longitudinis
lx. leucarum et latitudinis xvi. leucarum.’
The other range is frequently mentioned by Adamnan in the seventh
century as ‘Dorsum Britanniae,’ and once as ‘Dorsi montes Britannici,
quos Pictos et Scotos utrosque disterminant.’ The oldest of the Latin
chronicles mention Fergus, the first king of Dalriada, as reigning ‘a
monte Drumalban usque ad mare Hiberniae’ (_ib._ p. 130); and the Tract
de Situ Albaniae mentions the ‘montes qui dividunt Scotiam ab
Arregaithel.’
As this chain was the great boundary which originally separated the
Picts from the Scots of Dalriada, it is essential to a clear
understanding of the early history that its real position should not
be mistaken, and it is only necessary to examine the passages in which
it occurs to see that it was used with precision, and to identify the
mountain chain which was meant by it. Much confusion, however, has
been thrown into early Scottish history by the loose and arbitrary way
in which this name has been applied by modern writers to any great
mountain chain which they fancied might represent it, arising merely
from a want of accurate acquaintance with the true character of the
mountain system of Scotland, and a careless use of authorities. Of
modern historians Pinkerton alone has rightly placed the name of
Drumalban on the ridge which separates Argyllshire from Perthshire.
Mr. Cosmo Innes, in the map in his _Scotland in the Middle Ages_,
places it upon the great range of the Mounth, in which he is followed
by Mr. E. W. Robertson, in his _Scotland under her Early Kings_; and
Mr. Burton has made confusion worse confounded by identifying it with
“the range now called the Grampians” (_Hist._ vol. i. p. 15); in this
following Boece. Fordun gives an elaborate description of it in his
_Chronicle_, B. ii. c. 7; and Buchanan rightly describes it as the
highest part of Breadalban, and clearly indicates it as the ridge
separating the east from the west waters, ‘ex eo enim dorso flumina in
utrumque mare decurrunt, alia in septentrionem, alia in meridiem.’
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account