Celtic Scotland : $b A history of ancient Alban. Volume 1 (of 3), History and ethnologySkene, W. F. (William Forbes)
History
Celtic Scotland : $b A history of ancient Alban. Volume 1 (of 3), History and ethnology
Skene, W. F. (William Forbes)
Celts -- Scotland; Civilization, Celtic; Scotland -- Antiquities, Celtic; Scotland -- History -- To 1603
Chalmers has narrated the Roman campaigns with a strange affectation
of military language. He makes the Roman troops debouch, defile, and
deploy through the hills and in the glens in the most wonderful
manner, so as to have rendered the cutting off of the whole army at
any point of their progress no very difficult task to the natives. He
involves the troops in this march, when the army was divided into
three, among the remains of small camps in the hilly region of the
west of Fife in a manner to render the real account of the transaction
very unintelligible. General Roy, with correcter military knowledge,
but without attending to the narrative with sufficient minuteness, is
not more fortunate. He supposes that Agricola’s position was at the
camp at Ardoch, and that, when he divided his army into three, he
remained there with the main division, and sent the ninth legion to
Comrie, and the other division to Strageath, at both of which places
there are the remains of Roman camps; but, independently of the
expression ‘incessit,’ which implies a march forward, conceive an able
general sending the weakest legion into the heart of the Grampians, at
a distance of nine miles from the main body, through an almost
impassable country. So far from preventing the army from being
surrounded, it sent its weakest division into the midst of the enemy.
In what sense, too, could Agricola be said to have followed on the
enemy’s track, and how could he, between night and daybreak, have
received news of the attack, and have traversed what must have been,
without roads, a long day’s march? It is obvious, on a careful
attention to Tacitus’s expressions, that the three divisions could
have been at no great distance from each other, and the main division
nearest the enemy. There is a plan of the camp at Lintrose in General
Roy’s _Military Antiquities_, Plate XIV., which will show how
singularly it corresponds with the narrative.
Footnote 51:
Tacitus commences the campaign in which the ninth legion was attacked
by stating that it was in the sixth year of Agricola’s administration;
and in his speech before the battle at Mons Granpius he says it was
then the eighth year, and that the attack on the ninth legion had
taken place the preceding year. This apparent discrepancy has been
usually solved by supposing the word eighth a mistake for seventh, but
it is more probable that the previous campaign had lasted two years.
Tacitus, after the fifth year, ceases to mark the separate campaigns
with the same precision, and, perhaps, was not unwilling to gloss over
the little real progress that had been made during the last three
years. The expression, ‘Ad manus et arma conversi Caledoniam
incolentes populi,’ probably marks the commencement of the second year
of the campaign.
Footnote 52:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account