Chambers's Journal of Popular Literature, Science, and Art, Fifth Series, No. 38, Vol. I, September 20, 1884Various
History
Chambers's Journal of Popular Literature, Science, and Art, Fifth Series, No. 38, Vol. I, September 20, 1884
Various
Periodicals
The practical results of vaccination from the animal direct, are in
some respects somewhat dubious. Belgium and Holland have long been
familiar with it; but still there appears to be a lack of trustworthy
records as to the efficacy of the process as compared with the
arm-to-arm system. Whether the animal lymph is as potent a protector
from smallpox as that which has been passed through the human system,
cannot as yet be determined, though there would seem to be no ground
for any reasonable doubt upon the subject. That the humanising
process does in some way, at present quite inscrutable, affect it,
seems evident from the fact that the vaccine from the calf loses its
efficacy somewhat sooner than that from the human subject. It cannot
be stored for so long a time as the humanised lymph, and this renders
its distribution somewhat difficult. The best authorities, however,
are now inclined to the opinion that the difference in this respect is
not after all so great as was at first supposed. The two scientific
men in charge of this station are, however, enthusiasts in this
department of medical investigation, and it may be hoped that with the
enlarged sphere of operations which government is understood to be
contemplating, and aided by a well-appointed laboratory in connection
with this establishment, an important advance may soon be made in their
knowledge of the subject.
Compulsory vaccination has done much in other countries to free them
for long periods from this loathsome disease. Sweden and Denmark
enjoyed absolute immunity for twenty years; and in Austria, where very
stringent measures of compulsion are resorted to, they succeeded in
extirpating smallpox for long periods.
It was in 1853 that compulsion was first established in this country,
and as at first nearly every one obeyed the law, it was attended with
very beneficial results. At the registration of a birth, the registrar
has to give notice of the necessity of having the child vaccinated
within four months, and the penalty for neglect. From the registrar’s
return, it is seen at the local government Board if a medical
certificate attesting the vaccination as duly performed, has been
returned. Assuming that every child is registered, this system no doubt
would answer well; but there is much reason to fear that many children
in London escape being registered, and these do not come within the
cognisance of the local government Board. It is a question whether some
return should not be required from medical men of every child born
alive, with the address of its parents.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account