Chambers's Journal of Popular Literature, Science, and Art, Fifth Series, No. 40, Vol. I, October 4, 1884Various
Science
Chambers's Journal of Popular Literature, Science, and Art, Fifth Series, No. 40, Vol. I, October 4, 1884
Various
Periodicals
Although both the chaplain and the bishop had reason to complain of
their treatment, it must have been considerably more astonishing and
mortifying for Herr Franz Liszt, who is still delighting his musical
admirers with his productions, to find that in Haydn’s _Dictionary of
Dates_ (1870) he is represented as dying in October 1868.
The Queen’s Speech at the opening of a recent session of parliament
was hurriedly published in a Scotch newspaper without being revised by
the press-corrector, and Her Majesty, instead of saying that certain
negotiations ‘will, I doubt not, lead to satisfactory results,’ was
reported as saying, ‘will, I doubt, not lead to satisfactory results.’
So much for the misplacing of a comma!
With increased literature have come better systems of ‘reading’ and
correcting, and greater accuracy has been attained. Such mistakes
as above quoted are exceptional, and the morning newspaper may now
be read week after week with but few misprints. A good example of
accuracy in printing tables of figures—in which it is so difficult to
avoid errors—may be seen in _Bradshaw’s Railway Guide_, every monthly
part of which contains from seven to eight hundred thousand figures.
Astronomical and mathematical tables require great care in printing,
and very few are issued which can be relied upon as absolutely
correct. Charles Babbage superintended the production of a set of
trigonometrical tables in 1827 which perhaps stand unrivalled in this
respect. They were prepared for the Ordnance Survey of England and
Ireland, and a limited number of copies printed—it is said only thirty.
They consist of tables of logarithms and log. sines, tangents, cosines
and cotangents, _to every second_. Roughly speaking, they contain about
six millions of figures. The proof-sheets were revised by several sets
of readers, and were carefully examined and compared with other tables
no less than seven times. From Mr Babbage’s preface, we learn that
after the final stereotyping, seven errors were found in the logarithms
and one in the differences. These being corrected, the stereotyped
sheets were hung up in the Hall at Cambridge University, and a reward
offered to any one who could find an inaccuracy. Since their first
issue in 1827, no error has been discovered, and it may reasonably be
concluded that they are absolutely correct.
‘THE KING COUNTRY.’
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account