Chambers's Journal of Popular Literature, Science, and Art, Fifth Series, No. 111, Vol. III, February 13, 1886 — John Shaqi
Chambers's Journal of Popular Literature, Science, and Art, Fifth Series, No. 111, Vol. III, February 13, 1886Various
General
Chambers's Journal of Popular Literature, Science, and Art, Fifth Series, No. 111, Vol. III, February 13, 1886
Various
Periodicals
But there is to the Golden Age another side. It is not perfection;
it is not entirely happy. How imperfect it is, all of us know, and
the flaws on the surface are not the saddest; in fact, without some
of these, we should hardly recognise our human fellow-mortals, or we
should doubt that we knew them well. A great educator in his day was
wont to say that he dreaded receiving a boy whom the parents presented
with pride as faultless; he dreaded that the faults were within, ready
to break out as childhood disappeared. But all lovers of children will
acknowledge the manifold imperfection that is a part of their being;
and perhaps we should not love them so well if it was not craving our
sympathetic care. Again, this Golden Age is not an entirely happy time.
It is true that the outbursts of sobbing are forgotten sooner than we
can forget our sorrows; but the sobs were real while they lasted. As
George Eliot says, this anguish appears very trivial to weather-worn
mortals, who have to think about Christmas bills, dead loves, and
broken friendships; but it may be not less bitter, perhaps it is
even more bitter, than later troubles. ‘We can no longer recall the
poignancy of that moment and weep over it, as we do over the remembered
sorrows of five or ten years ago. Surely, if we could recall that
early bitterness and the dim guesses, the strangely perspectiveless
conception of life that gave the bitterness its intensity, we should
not pooh-pooh the griefs of children.’
So we have decided that the Golden Age is not perfect—anything but it!
And it is far from being entirely happy. There is another consideration
to be taken into account—what happiness we possessed in childhood we
did not understand or value. We had that ‘strangely perspectiveless
view of life’ which prevented us from enjoying our happiness as we
enjoy it now, when we know its value better, through experience and
through a wider view of the world. The want of a perspective to their
world gives to children’s grief its intensity; they cannot look beyond;
they cannot understand its passing away. But it also gives to joys
their shallowness; and there are manifold meanings in the saying,
that unless we have suffered we cannot rejoice. Therefore, in sighing
for life’s Golden Age again, the sigh means a wish, not for childhood
as childhood is, but for childhood with the added consciousness and
experience of after-years. To have freedom from care, and to know what
a burden care can be; to have freshness, and to know what _ennui_
means; to have habitual joyousness, after learning how anxiety can wear
the spirit out of life; to have love and wisdom watching over one,
as if one was what a child is to a mother’s heart, ‘the unconscious
centre and poise of the universe;’ and at the same time to know
the worth of such wisdom and love; to have our life all before us,
conscious of what life is and how short are the years; to find again
the Eden garden, innocent of evil, after having seen how evil fills
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account