Chambers's Journal of Popular Literature, Science, and Art, fifth series, no. 121, vol. III, April 24, 1886Various
General
Chambers's Journal of Popular Literature, Science, and Art, fifth series, no. 121, vol. III, April 24, 1886
Various
Periodicals
Mr Shirley Hibberd’s paper on the Protection of British Wild-flowers,
recently read before the Horticultural Club, London, calls attention to
the possible extinction of many of our wild plants. Many of these are
in great demand for political as well as horticultural purposes, and
the lecturer made special mention of the modest primrose. He petitioned
all those who truly love the country to abstain from purchasing
wild plants from travelling hucksters, whose baskets represent the
half-way house for a plant on the road to extinction. He also strongly
deprecated the practice of offering prizes for wild-flowers at
flower-shows, as being another cause which must help extinction.
Sir Joseph Fayrer, in a recent lecture delivered in London on Cholera,
said that contagion by personal intercourse was a theory of the disease
which was no longer tenable. The British and Indian governments,
who were in possession of well-ascertained facts concerning this
subject, had discontinued all quarantine measures, and relied solely
upon sanitary laws. In perfect sanitation resided the sole means of
preventing the disease; and every individual should be scrupulously
careful in his living and clothing as the best means of prevention.
Care in diet, avoidance of all depressing influences, precautions
against chills, violent alternations of temperature, impure water,
unripe fruit, were the main considerations for those who wished to be
safe from cholera. In addition to these precautions, the dwellers in
every town and village in the country should do their best to secure
good ventilation, perfect drainage, and should avoid overcrowding. Many
of these safeguards are unfortunately beyond the scope of individual
effort, especially in our crowded cities; but much good could be done
if public bodies would only do their duty.
One of the London vestry clerks has proposed a comprehensive scheme
for getting rid of and utilising the contents of the London dustbins.
On the banks of the Thames between Tilbury and Southend there is
an expanse of useless, marshy land which only waits the process of
reclamation. The proposal is to convey the refuse of London to this
land and to turn it into profitable terra-firma. It is calculated
that the metropolis pays at present one hundred and twenty thousand
pounds annually for the removal of dust and road-sweepings, which go
to the farmers and brickmakers. If the new scheme could be carried
out at the same or less cost, Londoners would be glad to adopt it. At
present, householders are entirely at the mercy of the contractor, who
undertakes to remove the dust regularly, but does not do so.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account