Chambers's journal of popular literature, science, and art, fifth series, no. 125, vol. III, May 22, 1886Various
History
Chambers's journal of popular literature, science, and art, fifth series, no. 125, vol. III, May 22, 1886
Various
Periodicals
‘You shan’t have it!—you shan’t have it!’ she cried excitedly, while a
bright red spot burned on either cheek. ‘You would’—— With marvellous
self-control, she stopped dead short; and after an almost imperceptible
pause, she added in her usual quiet tones: ‘Pray, forgive me, Arthur;
I am so afraid of Bertie hurting himself.—Go up to the nursery, dear.
Mamma will come to you.’
Awe-struck at her late passion, the child went gently out of the room,
and his mother following him, I was left alone with Crawford. It went
to my heart to see the pained, drawn look on his face; but the scene
had at all events put one thing beyond a doubt: Mrs Crawford was not
merely failing in brain-power—she was mad.
A couple of days went by, and I became fairly puzzled. All the ordinary
verbal tests when applied to my patient proved complete failures. Her
memory was excellent, and indeed in this respect she was far better
than her husband, who was constantly forgetting things. As to her
judgment, it struck me as above the average, for she was a widely-read
woman, and we had a stiff argument one night as to the merits of our
favourite authors. She managed her own housekeeping, and capitally
she did it too; and, in fact—not to exhaust the reader’s patience
by entering into details—the only visible outcome of her mental
aberration was this extreme terror in which she lived, and for which
I could find no reason. (I may remark parenthetically that the mad
undoubtedly have rules of their own by which they are influenced.
Experience thus teaching me that Mrs Crawford had some reason for this,
to us, inexplicable dread—even though it might be but a fear of her
own shadow—it became my business to solve this reason.) What baffled
me most was the fact that while it was Crawford himself who primarily
excited this terror, she was undeniably fond of him. Indeed, the word
‘fond’ is hardly suitable, for she simply adored him. I never heard
him express the slightest wish as to the household arrangements but it
was instantly fulfilled; while every whim—and he was the most whimsical
of men—was implicitly obeyed. In fact, at the end of a week I was
precisely in the same state as when I first entered the house. But that
my _amour propre_ was piqued, and I felt angry at my non-success, I
should have been paying a very enjoyable visit. Arthur Crawford made
a capital host; and although, as I have already said, he was a very
whimsical man, and was subject to unaccountable fits of depression, he
and I got on excellently together.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account