Chambers's Journal of Popular Literature, Science, and Art, No. 694: April 14, 1877. — John Shaqi
Chambers's Journal of Popular Literature, Science, and Art, No. 694: April 14, 1877.Various
History
Chambers's Journal of Popular Literature, Science, and Art, No. 694: April 14, 1877.
Various
Periodicals
This brings us to the project now set on foot by Mr Erasmus Wilson, an
eminent surgeon in London, and who has munificently undertaken to be
at the entire cost of bringing the obelisk from Alexandria. The idea
of doing so arose, as Mr Wilson explains in a letter to a friend, in
having had a communication from General Sir James Alexander, C.B. 'He,
Sir James, recounted that he had paid a visit to the prostrate obelisk
at Alexandria in the spring of 1875, with the view of ascertaining its
state of preservation and the possibility of bringing it to London;
that he stripped it of its covering of sand, and found the column
uninjured, and that he felt assured that its transit might be safely
accomplished; that all that was needed were the means of defraying the
cost, and the determination to bring the undertaking to a successful
issue; that he contemplated for this object to obtain the interest
of the city of London and the government; but that, although he had
secured the co-operation of the Metropolitan Board of Works for a site
on the Thames Embankment, he had made no substantial progress.' Mr
Wilson goes on to explain what he did in the circumstances. 'On the
7th of December, I had a conversation with Sir James Alexander. He was
very anxious to succeed in his object, and he mentioned a plan proposed
by Mr John Dixon, C.E., whom I promised to see. At my interview with
him, I listened to his plan. He explained the position of the monolith,
within a few yards of the sea, and the ease with which it could be
inclosed in a cylinder, rolled into the water, towed to the harbour
for the purpose of putting on to it a keel, a rudder, and a deck, and
then ballasting it to a proper depth of flotation. The process required
care, nicety, and judgment, but was evidently sound and practicable.'
The professional advice Mr Wilson received helped to confirm this
opinion, and he finally resolved to enter into a contract for the safe
transport of the monolith. Mr Dixon was willing to limit the cost to
eight thousand pounds; but to leave no room for failure, it was agreed
he should receive ten thousand pounds on the safe erection of the
obelisk on the Thames Embankment within a specified period. A contract
was entered into on this basis; Mr Dixon undertaking all risks.
We gather from Mr Wilson's letter that he had serious misgivings
as to the success of a public subscription, and that after all it
was a shabby kind of proceeding, unworthy of so great an object. In
short, feeling he could afford the outlay, he took the matter in hand
personally, and the element of expense was therefore at an end. Any
other difficulty was removed by Mr Dixon receiving the concurrence of
the government and of the Khedive of Egypt. 'I have,' says Mr Wilson,
'the assurance from Mr Dixon that the cylinder ship with its precious
freight may be expected to float into the Thames in July next.'
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account