Chance, Love, and Logic: Philosophical Essays — John Shaqi
Chance, Love, and Logic: Philosophical EssaysPeirce, Charles S. (Charles Sanders)
Philosophy
Chance, Love, and Logic: Philosophical Essays
Peirce, Charles S. (Charles Sanders)
Metaphysics; Peirce, Charles S. (Charles Sanders), 1839-1914 -- Bibliography; Pragmatism; Science -- Philosophy
The irritation of doubt is the only immediate motive for the struggle to
attain belief. It is certainly best for us that our beliefs should be
such as may truly guide our actions so as to satisfy our desires; and
this reflection will make us reject any belief which does not seem to
have been so formed as to insure this result. But it will only do so by
creating a doubt in the place of that belief. With the doubt, therefore,
the struggle begins, and with the cessation of doubt it ends. Hence, the
sole object of inquiry is the settlement of opinion. We may fancy that
this is not enough for us, and that we seek not merely an opinion, but a
true opinion. But put this fancy to the test, and it proves groundless;
for as soon as a firm belief is reached we are entirely satisfied,
whether the belief be false or true. And it is clear that nothing out of
the sphere of our knowledge can be our object, for nothing which does
not affect the mind can be a motive for a mental effort. The most that
can be maintained is, that we seek for a belief that we shall _think_ to
be true. But we think each one of our beliefs to be true, and, indeed,
it is mere tautology to say so.
That the settlement of opinion is the sole end of inquiry is a very
important proposition. It sweeps away, at once, various vague and
erroneous conceptions of proof. A few of these may be noticed here.
1. Some philosophers have imagined that to start an inquiry it was only
necessary to utter or question or set it down on paper, and have even
recommended us to begin our studies with questioning everything! But the
mere putting of a proposition into the interrogative form does not
stimulate the mind to any struggle after belief. There must be a real
and living doubt, and without all this discussion is idle.
2. It is a very common idea that a demonstration must rest on some
ultimate and absolutely indubitable propositions. These, according to
one school, are first principles of a general nature; according to
another, are first sensations. But, in point of fact, an inquiry, to
have that completely satisfactory result called demonstration, has only
to start with propositions perfectly free from all actual doubt. If the
premises are not in fact doubted at all, they cannot be more
satisfactory than they are.
3. Some people seem to love to argue a point after all the world is
fully convinced of it. But no further advance can be made. When doubt
ceases, mental action on the subject comes to an end; and, if it did go
on, it would be without a purpose.
V
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account