Charles Dickens: A critical studyChesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
General
Charles Dickens: A critical study
Chesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
Dickens, Charles, 1812-1870
John Dickens, his father, was, as stated, a clerk; but such mere terms
of trade tell us little of the tone or status of a family. Browning’s
father (to take an instance at random) would also be described as a
clerk and a man of the middle class; but the Browning family and the
Dickens family have the colour of two different civilizations. The
difference cannot be conveyed merely by saying that Browning stood
many strata above Dickens. It must also be conveyed that Browning
belonged to that section of the middle class which tends (in the small
social sense) to rise; the Dickenses to that section which tends in
the same sense to fall. If Browning had not been a poet, he would have
been a better clerk than his father, and his son probably a better
and richer clerk than he. But if they had not been lifted in the air
by the enormous accident of a man of genius, the Dickenses, I fancy
would have appeared in poorer and poorer places, as inventory clerks,
as caretakers, as addressers of envelopes, until they melted into the
masses of the poor.
Yet at the time of Dickens’s birth and childhood this weakness in their
worldly destiny was in no way apparent; especially it was not apparent
to the little Charles himself. He was born and grew up in a paradise of
small prosperity. He fell into the family, so to speak, during one of
its comfortable periods, and he never in those early days thought of
himself as anything but as a comfortable middle-class child, the son
of a comfortable middle-class man. The father whom he found provided
for him, was one from whom comfort drew forth his most pleasant and
reassuring qualities, though not perhaps his most interesting and
peculiar. John Dickens seemed, most probably, a hearty and kindly
character, a little florid of speech, a little careless of duty in
some details, notably in the detail of education. His neglect of his
son’s mental training in later and more trying times was a piece of
unconscious selfishness which remained a little acrimoniously in his
son’s mind through life. But even in this earlier and easier period
what records there are of John Dickens give out the air of a somewhat
idle and irresponsible fatherhood. He exhibited towards his son that
contradiction in conduct which is always shown by the too thoughtless
parent to the too thoughtful child. He contrived at once to neglect his
mind, and also to over-stimulate it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account