Charles Dickens: A critical studyChesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
General
Charles Dickens: A critical study
Chesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
Dickens, Charles, 1812-1870
For the boy individually the prospect seemed to be growing drearier
and drearier. This phrase indeed hardly expresses the fact; for, as
he felt it, it was not so much a run of worsening luck as the closing
in of a certain and quiet calamity like the coming on of twilight and
dark. He felt that he would die and be buried in blacking. Through all
this he does not seem to have said much to his parents of his distress.
They who were in prison had certainly a much jollier time than he who
was free. But of all the strange ways in which the human being proves
that he is not a rational being, whatever else he is, no case is so
mysterious and unaccountable as the secrecy of childhood. We learn of
the cruelty of some school or child-factory from journalists; we learn
it from inspectors, we learn it from doctors, we learn it even from
shame-stricken schoolmasters and repentant sweaters; but we never
learn it from the children; we never learn it from the victims. It
would seem as if a living creature had to be taught, like an art of
culture, the art of crying out when it is hurt. It would seem as if
patience were the natural thing; it would seem as if impatience were an
accomplishment like whist. However this may be, it is wholly certain
that Dickens might have drudged and died drudging, and buried the
unborn Pickwick, but for an external accident.
He was, as has been said, in the habit of visiting his father at
the Marshalsea every week. The talks between the two must have been
a comedy, at once more cruel and more delicate than Dickens ever
described. Meredith might picture the comparison between the child
whose troubles were so childish, but who felt them like a damned
spirit, and the middle-aged man whose trouble was final ruin, and who
felt it no more than a baby. Once, it would appear, the boy broke down
altogether--perhaps under the unbearable buoyancy of his oratorical
papa--and implored to be freed from the factory--implored it, I fear,
with a precocious and almost horrible eloquence. The old optimist was
astounded--too much astounded to do anything in particular. Whether
the incident had really anything to do with what followed cannot be
decided, but ostensibly it had not. Ostensibly the cause of Charles’s
ultimate liberation was a quarrel between his father and Lamert, the
head of the factory. Dickens the elder (who had at last left the
Marshalsea) could no doubt conduct a quarrel with the magnificence of
Micawber; the result of this talent, at any rate, was to leave Mr.
Lamert in a towering rage. He had a stormy interview with Charles, in
which he tried to be good-tempered to the boy, but could hardly master
his tongue about the boy’s father. Finally he told him he must go, and
with every observance the little creature was solemnly expelled from
hell.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account