Charles Dickens: A critical studyChesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
General
Charles Dickens: A critical study
Chesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
Dickens, Charles, 1812-1870
This is a plain matter; but, unless it be stated and felt, Dickens may
be greatly misunderstood and greatly underrated. For not only is his
whole machinery directed to facilitating the self-display of certain
characters, but something more deep and more unmodern still is also
true of him. It is also true that all the _moving_ machinery exists
only to display entirely _static_ character. Things in the Dickens
story shift and change only in order to give us glimpses of great
characters that do not change at all. If we had a sequel of Pickwick
ten years afterwards, Pickwick would be exactly the same age. We know
he would not have fallen into that strange and beautiful second
childhood which soothed and simplified the end of Colonel Newcome.
Newcome, throughout the book, is in an atmosphere of time: Pickwick,
throughout the book, is not. This will probably be taken by most modern
people as praise of Thackeray and dispraise of Dickens. But this only
shows how few modern people understand Dickens. It also shows how few
understand the faiths and the fables of mankind. The matter can only be
roughly stated in one way. Dickens did not strictly make a literature;
he made a mythology.
For a few years our corner of Western Europe has had a fancy for this
thing we call fiction; that is, for writing down our own lives or
similar lives in order to look at them. But though we call it fiction,
it differs from older literatures chiefly in being less fictitious.
It imitates not only life, but the limitations of life; it not only
reproduces life, it reproduces death. But outside us, in every other
country, in every other age, there has been going on from the beginning
a more fictitious kind of fiction. I mean the kind now called folklore,
the literature of the people. Our modern novels, which deal with men
as they are, are chiefly produced by a small and educated section of
the society. But this other literature deals with men greater than
they are--with demi-gods and heroes; and that is far too important a
matter to be trusted to the educated classes. The fashioning of these
portents is a popular trade, like ploughing or bricklaying; the men who
made hedges, the men who made ditches, were the men who made deities.
Men could not elect their kings, but they could elect their gods. So we
find ourselves faced with a fundamental contrast between what is called
fiction and what is called folklore. The one exhibits an abnormal
degree of dexterity operating within our daily limitations; the other
exhibits quite normal desires extended beyond those limitations.
Fiction means the common things as seen by the uncommon people. Fairy
tales mean the uncommon things as seen by the common people.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account