Charles Dickens: A critical studyChesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
General
Charles Dickens: A critical study
Chesterton, G. K. (Gilbert Keith)
Dickens, Charles, 1812-1870
tales of Dick Deadshot, like the thousand and one tales of Robin Hood.
Here is the splendid and static boy, the boy who remains a boy through
a thousand volumes and a thousand years. Here in mean alleys and dim
shops, shadowed and shamed by the police, mankind is still driving its
dark trade in heroes. And elsewhere, and in all other ages, in braver
fashion, under cleaner skies the same eternal tale-telling goes on, and
the whole mortal world is a factory of immortals.
Dickens was a mythologist rather than a novelist; he was the last of
the mythologists, and perhaps the greatest. He did not always manage
to make his characters men, but he always managed, at the least, to
make them gods. They are creatures like Punch or Father Christmas. They
live statically, in a perpetual summer of being themselves. It was not
the aim of Dickens to show the effect of time and circumstance upon a
character; it was not even his aim to show the effect of a character on
time and circumstance. It is worth remark, in passing, that whenever he
tried to describe change in a character, he made a mess of it, as in
the repentance of Dombey or the apparent deterioration of Boffin. It
was his aim to show character hung in a kind of happy void, in a world
apart from time--yes, and essentially apart from circumstance, though
the phrase may seem odd in connection with the godlike horse-play of
“Pickwick.” But all the Pickwickian events, wild as they often are,
were only designed to display the greater wildness of souls, or
sometimes merely to bring the reader within touch, so to speak, of that
wildness. The author would have fired Mr. Pickwick out of a cannon to
get him to Wardle’s by Christmas; he would have taken the roof off to
drop him into Bob Sawyer’s party. But once put Pickwick at Wardle’s,
with his punch and a group of gorgeous personalities, and nothing will
move him from his chair. Once he is at Sawyer’s party, he forgets
how he got there; he forgets Mrs. Bardell and all his story. For the
story was but an incantation to call up a god, and the god (Mr. Jack
Hopkins) is present in divine power. Once the great characters are face
to face, the ladder by which they climbed is forgotten and falls down,
the structure of the story drops to pieces, the plot is abandoned, the
other characters deserted at every kind of crisis; the whole crowded
thoroughfare of the tale is blocked by two or three talkers, who take
their immortal ease as if they were already in Paradise. For they do
not exist for the story; the story exists for them; and they know it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account