Chaucer's Translation of Boethius's "De Consolatione Philosophiae"Boethius
ReligionComparative
Chaucer's Translation of Boethius's "De Consolatione Philosophiae"
Boethius
Happiness; Philosophy and religion
þe whiche
resou{n} {and} cause of difficulte I shal assaie at þe laste
to shewen {and} to speden.
[Sidenote: [* fol. 36 _b_.]]
¶ whan I haue *firste
[yspendyd / {and}] ansewered to þo resou{n}s by whiche þ{o}u 4668
art ymoeued.
[Sidenote: I ask, then, why you do not approve the reasoning of
such as think--that Prescience does not obstruct the liberty of
the will, because it is not the necessitating cause of future
events?]
¶ For I axe whi þ{o}u wenest þat þilk[e]
resou{n}s of hem þat assoilen þis questiou{n} ne ben nat
spedeful ynouȝ ne sufficient þe whiche soluc{i}ou{n} or þe
whiche resou{n} for þat it demiþ þat þe p{re}science nis nat 4672
cause of necessite to þinges to comen. þan ne weneþ it
nat þat fredom of wille be distourbed or ylett by p{re}science.
[Linenotes:
4653 _deuided[e]_--deuynede
_booke_--book
4654 _moeued[e]_--moeuede
4655 _souȝt_--I-sowht
4656 _long[e]_--longe
_haþ_--MS. haþe
4657 _yspedd_--MS. yspedde, C. Isped
_fermely_--MS. feruently, C. fermely
4658 _derkenesse_--dirknesse
[_of this_]--from C.
4662-3 [_myhten----men_]--from C.
4663 _myȝte_--myhten
4667 _firste_--fyrst
4668 [_yspendyd and_]--from C.
_þo_--the
_whiche_--which
4669 _art_--MS. arte
_þilk[e]_--thilke
4671 _spedeful_--spedful
4672 _whiche_--which
4674 _wille_--wyl]
[Headnote:
NECESSITY AND PRESCIENCE.]
[Sidenote: Do you draw an argument of the necessity of future
events, from any other topic than this,--that those things which
are foreknown must of necessity happen?]
for ne drawest þou nat argumentes from ellys
where of þe necessite of þinges to comen. As who seiþ 4676
any oþer wey þan þus. but þat þilke þinge[s] þat þe p{re}scie{n}ce
woot byforn [ne] mowen nat vnbitide. þat is to
seyn þat þei moten bitide.
[Sidenote: If divine prescience imposes no necessity upon future
things, must not the issue of things be voluntary, and man’s will
free and unconstrained?]
¶ But þan yif þat p{re}science
ne putteþ no necessite to þinges to comen. as þou þi self 4680
hast confessed it {and} byknowen a litel herbyforn{e}.
¶ what [[pg 162]]
cause [or what] is it. as who seiþ þere may no cause be.
by whiche þat þe endes (exitus) uoluntarie of þinges
myȝten be constreyned to certeyne bitydyng.
[Sidenote: For argument sake let us suppose there is no
prescience, would, then, the events which proceed from free-will
alone be under the power of necessity?]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account