The Allies of course adopted not only chlorine but phosgene as well,
since both were cheap, easy of preparation and effective. They felt
during the early part of the War that they should adopt a substance
that would kill instantly, and not one that would cause men to suffer
either during the attack or through symptoms which would develop later
in a hospital. For this reason a large amount of experimental work was
carried out on hydrocyanic acid, particularly by the French. Since this
gas has a very low density, it was necessary to mix with it substances
which would tend to keep it close to the ground during the attack.
Various mixtures, all called “vincennite,” were prepared,—chloroform,
arsenic trichloride and stannic chloride being used in varying
proportions with the acid. It was some time before it was definitely
learned that these mixtures were far from being successful, both from
the standpoint of stability and of poisonous properties. While the
French actually used these mixtures in constantly decreasing quantities
on the field for a long time, they were ultimately abandoned, though
not until American chemists had also carried out a large number
of tests. However, following the recommendation of the American
Gas Service in France in December, 1917, no vincennite was ever
manufactured by the United States.
LACHRYMATORS
Almost simultaneously with the introduction of the gas wave attacks, in
which liquefied gas under pressure was liberated from cylinders, came
the use of lachrymatory or tear gases. These, while not very poisonous
in the concentrations used, were very effective in incapacitating men
through the effects produced upon their eyes. The low concentration
required (one part in ten million of some lachrymators is sufficient
to make vision impossible without a mask) makes this form of gas
warfare very economical as well as very effective. Even if a mask
does completely protect against such compounds, their use compels an
army to wear the mask indefinitely, with an expenditure of shell far
short of that required if the much more deadly gases were used. Thus
Fries estimates that one good lachrymatory shell will force wearing
the mask over an area that would require 500 to 1000 phosgene shell
of equal size to produce the same effect. While the number of actual
casualties will be very much lower, the total effect considered from
the standpoint of the expenditure of ammunition and of the objectives
gained, will be just as valuable. So great is the harassing value
of tear and irritant gases that the next war will see them used in
quantities approximating that of the more poisonous gases.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account