The first lachrymator used was a mixture of the chlorides and bromides
of toluene. Benzyl chloride and bromide are the only valuable
substances in this mixture, the higher halogenated products having
little or no lachrymatory value. Xylyl bromide is also effective.
Chloroacetone and bromoacetone are also well known lachrymators, though
they are expensive to manufacture and are none too stable. Because of
this the French modified their preparation and obtained mixtures to
which they gave the name “martonite.” This is a mixture of 80 per cent
bromoacetone and 20 per cent chloroacetone, and can be made with nearly
complete utilization of the halogen. Methyl ethyl ketone may also be
used, which gives rise to the “homomartonite” of the French. During
the early part of the War, when bromine was so very expensive, the
English developed ethyl iodoacetate. This was used with or without the
addition of alcohol. Later the French developed bromobenzyl cyanide,
C₆H₅CH(Br)CN. This was probably the best lachrymator developed during
the War and put into large scale manufacture, though very little
of it was available on the field of battle before the War ended.
Chloroacetophenone would have played an important part had the War
continued.
DISADVANTAGE OF WAVE ATTACKS
As will be discussed more fully in the chapters on “The Tactics of
Gas,” the wave attacks became relatively less important in 1916
through the use of gas in artillery shell. This was the result of many
factors. Cloud gas attacks, as carried out under the old conditions,
required a long time for the preliminary preparations, entailed a
great deal of labor under the most difficult conditions, and were
dangerous of execution even when weather conditions became suitable.
The difficulties may be summarized as follows:
(1) The heavy gas cylinders used required a great deal of
transportation, and not only took the time of the Infantry but
rendered surprise attacks difficult owing both to the time required
and to the unusual activity behind the lines that became, with the
development of aeroplanes, more and more readily discerned.
(2) Few gases were available for wave attacks—chlorine, phosgene and,
to a less extent, chloropicrin proving to be the only ones successfully
used by either the Allies or the Germans. Hydrogen sulfide, carbon
monoxide and hydrocyanic acid gas were suggested and tried, but were
abandoned for one reason or another.
(3) Gas cloud attacks were wholly dependent upon weather conditions.
Not only were the velocity and direction of the wind highly important
as regards the successful carrying of the wave over the enemy’s line,
but also to prevent danger to the troops making the attack due to a
possible shift of the wind, which would carry the gas back over their
own line.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account