Children -- Books and reading; Children's literature -- Bibliography; Children's literature -- History and criticism
As early as 1893, Paul Ziegler established a German monthly, the
_Jugendschriftenwarte_, in which he purposed to teach the German
people how to examine children’s books, classical and modern. He
believed firmly that he would be able to reach some scientific basis,
some consistent standard, which would be founded upon psychological,
pedagogical, and æsthetic experience. This ambitious beginning by
Ziegler led to the organisation of committees for the same purpose.
In 1900, there were twenty-six centres throughout the Empire engaged
in the study, and they were soon gathered together by Heinrich
Wolgast,[55] a specialist on the subject of children’s reading, into
a “union” called “Die vereinigten deutschen Prüfungsausschüsse für
Jugendschriften.”
By 1906, the movement had so grown that seventy-eight local committees,
with a common interest and a strong organisation, were working in
twenty-six German States, their energy being felt and their example
being followed in Austria, Switzerland, and France.
These committees have been weeding out, according to their æsthetic,
educational, and national ideals, all undesirable literature for
children, leaving nothing but the best. It would appear that in the
course of their examination they called into account the opinions of
parent, teacher, librarian, author, illustrator, and publisher. The
local committees, working in hearty sympathy with the local libraries,
had but one watchword, _excellent_; the book was read three times by
a number of committees--sometimes as many as six, when the book would
pass through eighteen hands. If a committee’s decision was unanimous,
the result was sent to the central office of the confederation; if
there was a difference of opinion, an arbitrator was called in.
Miss Isabel Chadburn, in a suggestive article,[56] quotes fully some of
the final reports which are always sent to the _Jugendschriftenwarte_
for publication. Here is one dealing summarily with a book:
“‘The Lifeboat,’ Ballantyne (From the English of). Four pictures in
colour, black-and-white illustrations in the text; second edition; 8vo,
122 pages. Leipzig: Otto Spamer, 1892. Price 1 m.
“Tested by: Berlin (no); Breslau (no); Halle (no); Königsberg (yes);
Posen (no); Stettin (yes).
“A story of adventure in which the interest of the reader is directly
excited through the keeping up of a succession of extraordinary events.
The characterisation is utterly superficial and contradictory. The
style, hard to understand on account of the numerous technical nautical
terms, is full of indistinct and distorted metaphors and expressions.
The pictures are crude and badly drawn. Upon these grounds the book is
rejected.”
By the German method, a poor book would find small chances of
surviving. Already this test has met with opposition from the German
“Union of Booksellers, Selling on a Commission.” But the crusade is
steadily gaining ground and the influence having effect.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account