Children -- Books and reading; Children's literature -- Bibliography; Children's literature -- History and criticism
Émile is made an orphan; thus Rousseau gives himself full sway; thus
does he free himself from the necessity of constant consultation with
parents. He is determined to love the boy, to encourage him in his
sports, to develop his amiable instincts, his natural self. Émile must
not cry for the sweets of life; he must have a need for all things
rather than a joyful desire for some. Instead of teaching virtue to
him, Rousseau will try to shield him from a knowledge of all vice.
Where Plato recommends certain pastimes, he will train Émile to delight
in himself--thus making of him something of a youthful egoist. This
amœba state, endowed with all physical liberty, deprived of all dignity
of childish memory, is to be the boyhood of Émile. He “shall never
learn anything by heart, not even fables and not even those of La
Fontaine, artless and charming as they are.” Though he does not possess
the judgment to discriminate, he must be told the bare facts, and he
must discover for himself the relations which these facts bear to each
other. At the age of twelve, he shall hardly know a book when he sees
it. Rousseau calls books “cheerless furniture.”
So much for the boy; the girl Sophie fares as ill. Being of the woman
kind as well as of the child brand, she is to develop in even a more
colourless fashion. Fortunately all theory is not human actuality, and
Émile must have peopled his world in a way Rousseau could not prevent.
We are given natural rights and hereditary endowments; even the savage
has his standards and his dreams. Rousseau’s plan of existence ignored
the social evolution of history. Yet Émile might by such training have
been saved many wearisome explanations of the Mr. Barlow type, and it
is ofttimes true, as Mr. G. K. Chesterton claims, that the mysteries of
God are frequently more understandable than the solutions of man.
There was much in Rousseau’s book to rouse opposition; there was
equally as much to appeal to those whose instinctive love of childhood
was simply awaiting the flood gates to be opened. Like the Grimm
fairy tales of suspended animation, on the instant, the paternal
instinct began to be active, the maternal instinct to be motherly.
Rousseau--emended, modified, accentuated--overran England, France, and
Germany. Children were now recognised as children; it remained to be
seen whether they _were_ to be children.
The didactic era is in no way more fitly introduced than with the
names of Madame de Genlis and Arnaud Berquin in France, together with
the Edgeworth and Aikin families and Thomas Day in England. To each,
small space may be allotted, but they are worthy of full and separate
consideration.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account