Children -- Books and reading; Children's literature -- Bibliography; Children's literature -- History and criticism
With the fear that there is an effort on the part of many to
crystallise reading into a science, comes the necessity to foster
a love of reading for its own sake. The democracy of books has
grown larger with the cheapening process of manufacture; while the
establishment of public libraries offers to every one an equal
privilege. In an assemblage of many books, a certain spiritual dignity
should attach itself to the utilitarian fact.
There is no definition for children’s books; the essential point is
appeal, interest. As far back as 1844, a writer in the _Quarterly
Review_ very aptly claimed that “a genuine child’s book is as little
like a book for grown people cut down, as the child himself is like
a little old man.” Peculiarly, there is a popular misconception that
an author of juveniles advances in art only when he or she leaves off
penning stories or fairy tales, and begins publishing novels. On the
face of it, this is absurd. Like any other gift, writing for children
cannot be taught; it has to be born. If possible, with the exception of
drama, it is the most difficult art to master, since its narrative will
not stand imitation, since its simplicity must represent naturalness
and not effort, since its meaning must be within reach, and without the
tone of condescension.
Professor Richard Burton has written: “A piece of literature is
an organism, and should, therefore, be put before the scholar, no
matter how young, with its head on, and standing on both feet.” This
injunction applies to all books. Where the classics excel is in their
very fulness and honesty of narrative. Can the same be said of our
“series” brand?
The writing of children’s books is more aptly phrased the writing of
books for children. There was a time when such books, as a class by
themselves, were unknown; yet boys and girls expanded, and perhaps
remembered more of what they read than they do to-day, although they
were not taught as much. There are some pessimists, not so unwise in
their pessimism, who believe that if less emphasis was bestowed upon
the word _children_, and more upon the word _literature_, the situation
would be materially bettered.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account