Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 1. Pottery and early waresHobson, R. L. (Robert Lockhart)
History
Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 1. Pottery and early wares
Hobson, R. L. (Robert Lockhart)
Porcelain, Chinese; Pottery, Chinese
In their admiration of antiques the Chinese yield to none, and nowhere
have private collections been more jealously guarded and more difficult of
access. Even in the sixteenth century relatively large sums were paid for
Sung porcelains, and £30 was not too much for a "chicken wine cup" barely
a hundred years old. The ownership of a choice antique--say, of the Sung
dynasty--made the possessor a man of mark; perhaps even a marked man if
the local ruler chanced to be of a grasping nature.
A story is told on p. 75 of this volume of a Ko ware incense burner
(afterwards sold for 200 ounces of gold), which brought a man to
imprisonment and torture in the early Ming period; and, if the newspaper
account was correct, there was an incident in the recent revolution which
should touch the collector's heart. A prominent general, who, like so many
Chinese grandees, was an ardent collector, was expecting a choice piece
of porcelain from Shanghai. In due course the box arrived and was taken
to the general's sanctum. He proceeded to open it, no doubt with all the
eagerness and suppressed excitement which collectors feel in such tense
moments, only to be blown to pieces by a bomb! His enemies had known too
well the weak point in his defence.
Collecting is a less dangerous sport in England; but if it were not so,
the ardent collector would be in no way deterred. Warnings are wasted on
him, and he would follow his quarry, even though the path were strewn
with fragments of his indiscreet fellows. Still less is he discouraged
by difficulties of another kind, as illustrated 'by the story[2] of
T´ang's white Sung tripod, which was so closely imitated that its owner,
one of the most celebrated collectors of the sixteenth century, could not
distinguish the copy from the original. An eighteenth century Chinese
writer points the moral of the story: "When connoisseurs point with
admiration to a vessel, calling it Ting ware, or, again, Kuan ware, how
can we know that it is not a 'false tripod' which deceives them?" The
force of this question will be appreciated by collectors of Sung wares,
especially of the white Ting porcelains and the green celadons; for there
is nothing more difficult to classify correctly than these long-lived
types. There are, however, authentic Sung examples within reach, and
we can train our eyes with these, so that nothing but the very best
imitations will deceive us; and, after all, if we succeed in obtaining
a really first-rate Ming copy of a Sung type we shall be fortunate, for
if we ever discover the truth--which is an unlikely contingency--we may
console ourselves with thoughts of the enthusiast who eventually bought
T´ang's false tripod for £300 and "went home perfectly happy."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account