Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 1. Pottery and early waresHobson, R. L. (Robert Lockhart)
History
Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 1. Pottery and early wares
Hobson, R. L. (Robert Lockhart)
Porcelain, Chinese; Pottery, Chinese
[Illustration:
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Plate 44.--Early Translucent Porcelain, probably T´ang dynasty.
Fig. 1.--Cinquefoil Cup with ivory glaze clouded with pinkish buff stains.
Diameter 3¾ inches. _Breuer Collection._
Fig. 2.--Vase of white, soft-looking ware, very thin and translucent with
pearly white, crackled glaze powdered with brown specks. Height 3⅛
inches. _Peters Collection._]
[Illustration:
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Plate 45.--T´ang and Sung Wares.
Fig. 1.--Square Vase with engraved lotus scrolls and formal borders.
_T´u-ting_ ware, Sung dynasty. Height 20 inches. _Peters Collection._
Fig. 2.--Ewer with phœnix head, slightly translucent porcelain with light
greenish grey glaze with tinges of blue in the thicker parts; carved
designs. Probably T´ang dynasty. Height 15¼ inches. _Eumorfopoulos
Collection._]
The whole question of these interesting porcelains is complicated by
the fact that the Coreans were admittedly indebted to the Ting Chou
potters for many of their designs;[323] and by the fact that while
close intercourse between China and Corea existed the Coreans may well
have imported Chinese wares and deposited some of them in the tombs. An
authentic find of these porcelains in a Chinese tomb would give important
evidence on this point, but so far there is no evidence of their being
found in China beyond the statement of traders, and it is quite certain
that they have been found in Corean tombs. It may be added that the
Japanese class them as _hakugorai_ or white Corean ware, and stoutly
support their Corean origin.
FOOTNOTES:
[Footnote 292: Op. cit., pp. 17-20.]
[Footnote 293: _Chinese Art_, vol. ii., p. 17, and the _Catalogue of the
Morgan Collection_ (1907), p. xlviii.]
[Footnote 294: [Chinese] _wa ch'i yeh_. The _Shuo Wên_ was compiled by
Hsü Shên and published first in 120 A.D. The word _tz'ŭ_ [Chinese] is
compounded of the radical _wa_ [Chinese] (a tile, earthenware), and the
phonetic _tz'ŭ_ [Chinese] (second, inferior), and carries no inherent
suggestion of porcelain. If connoting a new material, it may be a name
applied specially to glazed pottery which seems to date from the Han
period, or even to stoneware as opposed to soft earthenware or brick.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account