Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 2. Ming and Ch'ing PorcelainHobson, R. L. (Robert Lockhart)
History
Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 2. Ming and Ch'ing Porcelain
Hobson, R. L. (Robert Lockhart)
Porcelain, Chinese; Pottery, Chinese
Yet another group of superior quality is obviously connected with the
European trade by a peculiar mark (see vol. i., p. 228) resembling the
letter C or G. It is most commonly represented by pairs of bottles with
globular body and tall, tapering neck, decorated with flowing scrolls
of curious rosette-like flowers, a design stated with much probability
to have been copied from Dutch delft. As the Dutch design in question
had evidently been based on a Chinese original, the peculiar nature
of the flowers explains itself. There are other instances of patterns
bandied in this way between the Far East and the West. The same
peculiar floral scroll appears in _famille verte_ associated with
the same mark; and the same G mark occurs on two rare bottles in the
collection of Mr. J. C. J. Drucker, which have blue and white painting
on the neck and _famille verte_ designs in the finest enamels on the
body. A deep bowl in the Eumorfopoulos collection with _famille verte_
panels of symbols from the Hundred Antiques, and a ground of green
“prunus” pattern, bears the same mark. Neither of these last examples
can be even remotely connected with Dutch influence, so that we may
dismiss the suggestion that the letter in the mark is intended to be
a D, standing for D(elft), for this reason quite apart from the fact
that such a mark on Delft ware is non-existent. I imagine that the true
explanation is that this peculiar mark is a merchant’s sign placed by
order on the goods made for some particular trader.
A close copy of the “wing handles” of Venetian glass on certain blue
and white bottles (Plate 92, Fig. 3), the appearance of Prince of
Wales’s feathers in the border of a plate and of an heraldic eagle in
the well of a salt cellar, no less than many forms obviously Western
in origin, further emphasise the close relations between the Ching-tê
Chên potters and European traders.[286] An immense quantity of
indifferent blue and white was made for the European table services,
and summarily decorated with baskets of flowers, the usual flowering
plant designs, close patterns of small blossoms, floral scrolls with
large, meaningless flowers, ivy scrolls, passion flowers, and numerous
stereotyped designs, such as dragons in sea waves, prunus pattern
borders, pine tree and stork, a garden fence with rockery and flowering
shrubs, groups from the Hundred Antiques, a parrot on a tree stump,
etc. The blue of these pieces is usually rather dull and heavy, but
the ware has the characteristic appearance of K’ang Hsi porcelain, and
was evidently made for the most part about the year 1700. If marked
at all, the marks are usually symbols, such as the double fish, the
lozenge, the leaf, a tripod vase, and a strange form of the character
_shou_ known as the “spider mark” (see vol. i., p. 225). The
plates are often edged with lustrous brown glaze to prevent that
chipping and scaling to which the Chinese glaze was specially liable on
projecting parts of the ware.[287]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account