Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 2. Ming and Ch'ing PorcelainHobson, R. L. (Robert Lockhart)
History
Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 2. Ming and Ch'ing Porcelain
Hobson, R. L. (Robert Lockhart)
Porcelain, Chinese; Pottery, Chinese
As we have already discussed, so far as our imperfect knowledge
permits, the various potteries which are scattered over the length and
breadth of China, we can now concentrate our attention on the rising
importance of Ching-tê Chên. From the beginning of the Ming dynasty,
Ching-tê Chên may be said to have become the ceramic metropolis of the
empire, all the other potteries sinking to provincial status. So far
as Western collections, at any rate, are concerned, it is not too much
to say that 90 per cent. of the post-Yüan porcelains were made in this
great pottery town.
What happened there in the stormy years which saw the overthrow of
the Mongol dynasty and the rise of the native Ming is unknown to us,
and, indeed, it is scarcely likely to have been of much interest.
The Imperial factories were closed, and did not open till 1369, or,
according to some accounts, 1398.[1] If we follow the _Ching-tê Chên
T’ao lu_, which, as its name implies, should be well informed on
the history of the place, a factory was built in 1369 at the foot of
the Jewel Hill to supply Imperial porcelain (_kuan tz’ŭ_), and
in the reign of Hung Wu (1368–1398) there were at least twenty kilns
in various parts of the town working in the Imperial service. They
included kilns for the large dragon bowls, kilns for blue (or green)
ware (_ch’ing yao_), “wind and fire”[2] kilns, seggar kilns
for making the cases for the fine porcelain, and _lan kuang_
kilns, which Julien renders _fours à flammes étendues_. The last
expression implies that the heat was raised in these kilns by means of
a kind of bellows (_kuang_) which admitted air to the furnace,
and Bushell’s rendering, “blue and yellow enamel furnaces,” ignores an
essential part of both the characters[3] used in the original.
From this time onward there is no lack of information on the nature
of the Imperial wares made during the various reigns, but it must be
remembered that the Chinese descriptions are in almost every case
confined to the Imperial porcelains, and we are left to assume that
the productions of the numerous private kilns followed the same lines,
though in the earlier periods, at any rate, we are told that they were
inferior in quality and finish.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account