Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 2. Ming and Ch'ing PorcelainHobson, R. L. (Robert Lockhart)
History
Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 2. Ming and Ch'ing Porcelain
Hobson, R. L. (Robert Lockhart)
Porcelain, Chinese; Pottery, Chinese
The usual formulæ are employed by the _T’ao lu_ in describing the
Imperial ware of this reign. It was made of plastic clay and refined
material, and though, as a rule, the porcelain was thick, there
were some exceedingly thin varieties known as _t’o t’ai_[6] or
“bodiless” porcelains. Besides the plain white specimens, there were
others engraved with a point[7] or coated with vivid red (_hsien
hung_). The _Po wu yao lan_,[8] reputed a high authority on
Ming porcelains and written in the third decade of the seventeenth
century, adds “blue and white” to the list and gives further details of
the wares. The passage is worth quoting in full, and runs as follows:
“In the reign of Yung Lo were made the cups which fit in the palm of
the hand,[9] with broad mouth, contracted waist, sandy (_sha_)
foot, and polished base. Inside were drawn two lions rolling balls.
Inside, too, in seal characters, was written _Ta Ming Yung Lo nien
chih_[10] in six characters, or sometimes in four[11] only, as fine
as grains of rice. These are the highest class. Those with mandarin
ducks, or floral decoration inside, are all second quality. The cups
are decorated outside with blue ornaments of a very deep colour,
and their shape and make are very refined and beautiful and in a
traditional style. Their price, too, is very high. As for the modern
imitations, they are coarse in style and make, with foot and base burnt
(brown), and though their form has some resemblance (to the old), they
are not worthy of admiration.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account