Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 2. Ming and Ch'ing PorcelainHobson, R. L. (Robert Lockhart)
History
Chinese pottery and porcelain; vol. 2. Ming and Ch'ing Porcelain
Hobson, R. L. (Robert Lockhart)
Porcelain, Chinese; Pottery, Chinese
But all the other forms of polychrome decoration at this period must
yield (numerically, at any rate) to the on-glaze painting in _famille
rose_ enamels, or, as the Chinese have named them, “foreign
colours.” The nature of these has been fully discussed, but there is
no doubt that their application was widely extended in the Ch’ien Lung
period, and one point of difference, at least, is observable in their
technique, viz. the mixing of the tints in the actual design so as to
produce the European effect of shading. By this means the graded tints
in the petals of a flower, and the stratified surface of rocks and
mountains, are suggestively rendered.
It would be impossible to enumerate the endless varieties of design
employed in this large group. Contrasting the decoration of his own
time with that of the Ming porcelain, the author of the _T’ao
shuo_,[452] which was published in 1774, says: “Porcelain painted
in colours excelled in the Ming dynasty, the majority of the patterns
being derived from embroidery and brocaded satins, three or four only
out of each ten being from nature and copies of antiques. In modern
porcelain, out of ten designs you will get four of foreign colouring,
three taken from nature, two copies of antiques, one from embroidery or
satin brocade.”
In their ordinary acceptation the terms are not mutually exclusive, and
the last three types might be, and indeed are, all expressed in foreign
colouring; but presumably the writer refers especially to that kind of
“foreign colouring” which was directly based on the Canton enamels and
is illustrated in the ruby-back eggshell dishes.
The designs taken from nature would include figure subjects
representing personages and interiors, landscapes, growing flowers and
fruit, and the like, good examples of which are shown on Plates 126 and
127. The one represents the “Hundred Flowers,” the vase being, as it
were, one great bouquet and the flowers being drawn naturalistically
enough to be individually recognised. The other recalls the
celebrated picture of the “Hundred Deer” by the late Ming artist, Wên
Chêng-ming.[453]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account