The origin of the blackboard—that moral pillory—of the Stock Exchange occurred in 1787. “There were no less than twenty-five lame ducks,” said the _Whitehall Evening Post_, “who waddled out of the Alley.” Their deficiency was estimated at £250,000; and it was upon this occasion the above plan was first proposed, and a very full meeting resolved, that those who did not either pay their deficiencies or name their principals should be publicly exposed on a blackboard to be ordered for the occasion. Thus the above deficiencies—larger than had been previously known—alarmed the gentlemen of ’Change Alley, and produced that system which is yet regarded with wholesome awe. During the administration of Mr. Pitt, in 1786, a sinking fund was again attempted; the various branches of revenue being united under the title of the Consolidated Fund. One million was annually taken from it, and placed in the hands of the Commissioners for the Redemption of the National Debt, and was applied in purchasing such funds as might be deemed expedient at the prices of the day. The interest of the debt thus redeemed, the life-annuities which fell in, or the annuities which expired, were added to the fund, the interest of which, when the principal amounted to four millions, was no longer to be applied to it, but remain at the disposal of Parliament. The difficulties which every minister met in every new loan, were more in proportion to the power of the opposition, than to the fairness or necessity of the demand. In unpopular wars, these difficulties were doubly increased. In the American contest, the whole population demanded peace; and nothing but the obstinacy of “the best farmer and worst king,”—nothing but a corrupt Parliament, wholesale places, a dominant aristocracy, and large premiums to the moneyed interest,—could have carried Lord North through the session, enlivened by his humor, and the enmity created by the war. The loans, therefore, of this period were fiercely attacked; ’Change Alley fiercely denounced; and the plans of the government hotly contested. The mode of conducting the loans was then, as before, made conducive to the majority of the ministry, at the expense of the people. Out of 60,000 lottery-tickets, 22,000 were given to a few members, producing £44,000 profit. When the system was attacked, precedent, the bane of official people, was quoted; and because it was known that, in 1763, Mr. Fox had £100,000, Mr. Calcraft and Mr. Drummond £70,000, the Governor of the Bank £150,000 for the corporation, and £50,000 for himself, and other members similar sums, it was deemed a sufficient and an unanswerable defence. But though by such methods the minister got the votes of the House, he found it more difficult to get the money from the public after it was voted. In 1779, he was greatly troubled to procure it on reasonable terms. From bankers he went to contractors, from contractors to stock-jobbers, and from