Borgia family; Borja, Francisco de, Saint, 1510-1572; Italy -- History -- 1492-1559
But when a person is said to have died “not without suspicion of venom,”
it is very rarely that steps are taken, juridically to examine that
suspicion with a view to proving it to be founded on fact or falsehood.
The world deliberately prefers to believe the worst of man, deliberately
prefers suspicion. The expression in the Fifteenth and Sixteenth
Centuries was as randomly and as inconsequently used as the cry for a
General Council, by every one who found occasion to go “against the
government”; and it certainly does not command respect by reason of its
absurdly frequent repetition. It was the fashion for their enemies to
accuse the Borgia of compassing the death of some by venom. It was also
the fashion for the Borgia to retort upon their enemies in the same
formula. There can be no human doubt that the Borgia and their enemies
would have envenomed each the other, had they known how to do so with
security and certainty. It was a habit of the Latin Races to see no
distinction between venom and steel when the idea was to get rid of a
foe. Cold northern nations, the English in particular, always have had a
horror of venom, preferring boots, fists, bullet, or blade; indeed one
of the most hideous penances ordained by English and Post-Reformation
law was awarded to criminals who had envenomed the lieges. They were
boiled alive. “This year, the XVII March, was boyled in Smithfield one
Margaret Davis, a maiden which had poisoned three households that she
dwelled in.” (Wriothesley’s Chronicle, 1542.)
Perhaps to this habit, of regarding the use of venom as so horrible a
crime, is due the fascination which those, who are supposed to have
attained high eminence in its practice, have for Englishmen.
Undoubtedly, Lord Alexander P.P. VI and Duke Cesare de Valentinois della
Romagna are regarded as having been artists in venom, possessing
knowledge far surpassing that of modern alchymists. They are believed to
have envenomed their foes, named and unnamed, by the score; and, at
last, to have fallen into the pit that they have digged for others.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account