Calm and sound reasoning of Federalist, advocating the real Constitution, contrasted with irrelevant personal abuse by those supporting the imaginary new Constitution--Latter, because facts and law make their Tory concept absurd, revive “impious doctrine of Old World” that human beings were made for political entities and governments--Senator Sheppard and his eloquent claim that American citizens, like other machinery, must be kept in good condition for their government owner--His “discovery” that the states, political entities, made the Constitution of America, the nation of men--Story of America (from May 29, 1787, to July, 1917) being a sealed book to him, he does not know that our Constitution is both federal and national--Supreme Court, in early days and in 1907, and Webster and Lincoln tell him his mistake--Not knowing the decision of Gettysburg, recorded at Appomattox, he chooses between Lord North of 1775 and Calhoun and summons the latter to prove that the American people did not make their Constitution and its grant of enumerated power to interfere with their individual freedom--Jefferson, Pendleton, Webster and many other Americans correct Sheppard’s error of fact--As the American people of 1776 accomplished their successful Revolution against government, may it not be the thought of Sheppard and other Tories that the Eighteenth Amendment has been established by a successful revolution of government against the people--Marshall again tells us of the American day when the legal necessity “was felt and acknowledged by all,” that every power to interfere with human liberty must be derived from the people in their “conventions”--Acting on the Congress proposal of 1917, governments of state citizens command the American citizen and create a new government power to interfere with his individual liberty--But no statesman has yet told us how or when, prior to 1917, we became “subjects.” XIX. ARE WE CITIZENS? _Page 298_