and acquired sexual constitutions of individuals and cuts off a
considerable number of them from sexual enjoyment, thus becoming a
cause of grievous injustice. The effect of these restrictive measures
might presumably be that all the sexual interest of those who are
normal and not constitutionally handicapped could flow without further
forfeiture into the channel left open to it. But the only outlet not
thus censured, heterosexual genital love, is further circumscribed by
the barriers of legitimacy and monogamy. Present-day civilization gives
us plainly to understand that sexual relations are permitted only on
the basis of a final, indissoluble bond between a man and woman; that
sexuality as a source of enjoyment for its own sake is unacceptable
to it; and that its intention is to tolerate it only as the hitherto
irreplaceable means of multiplying the human race.
This, of course, represents an extreme. Everyone knows that it has
proved impossible to put it into execution, even for short periods.
Only the weaklings have submitted to such comprehensive interference
with their sexual freedom, and stronger natures have done so only
under one compensatory condition, of which mention may be made later.
Civilized society has seen itself obliged to pass over in silence many
transgressions which by its own ordinances it ought to have penalized.
This does not justify anyone, however, in leaning towards the other
side and assuming that, because it does not achieve all it aims at,
such an attitude on the part of society is altogether harmless. The
sexual life of civilized man is seriously disabled, whatever we may
say; it sometimes makes an impression of being a function in process of
becoming atrophied, just as organs like our teeth and our hair seem to
be. One is probably right in supposing that the importance of sexuality
as a source of pleasurable sensations, _i.e._ as a means of fulfilling
the purpose of life, has perceptibly decreased.[14] Sometimes one
imagines one perceives that it is not only the oppression of culture,
but something in the nature of the function itself that denies us full
satisfaction and urges us in other directions. This may be an error;
it is hard to decide.[15]
FOOTNOTES:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account