There is an unmistakable social factor at work in the impulse of
civilization towards cleanliness, which has been subsequently justified
by considerations of hygiene but had nevertheless found expression
before they were appreciated. The impulse towards cleanliness
originates in the striving to get rid of excretions which have become
unpleasant to the sense-perceptions. We know that things are different
in the nursery. Excreta arouse no aversion in children; they seem
precious to them, as being parts of their own bodies which have been
detached from them. The training of children is very energetic in
this particular; its object is to expedite the development that lies
ahead of them, according to which the excreta are to become worthless,
disgusting, horrible and despicable to them. Such a reversal of
values would be almost impossible to bring about, were it not that
these substances expelled from the body are destined by their strong
odours to share the fate that overtook the olfactory stimuli after
man had erected himself from the ground. Anal erotism, therefore, is
from the first subjected to the ‘organic repression’ which opened up
the way to culture. The social factor which has been active in the
further modifications of anal erotism comes into play with the fact
that in spite of all man’s evolutionary progress the smell of his own
excretions is scarcely disagreeable to him yet, but so far only that
of the evacuations of others. The man who is not clean, _i.e._ who
does not eliminate his excretions, therefore offends others, shows no
consideration for them—a fact which is exemplified in the commonest
and most forcible terms of abuse. It would be incomprehensible, too,
that man should use as an abusive epithet the name of his most faithful
friend in the animal world, if dogs did not incur the contempt of men
through two of their characteristics, _i.e._ that they are creatures of
smell and have no horror of excrement, and, secondly, that they are not
ashamed of their sexual functions.
[14] There is a short story, which I valued long ago, by a highly
sensitive writer, the Englishman, John Galsworthy, who to-day enjoys
general recognition; it is called ‘The Apple Tree’. It shows in a very
moving and forcible way how there is no longer any place in present-day
civilized life for a simple natural love between two human beings.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account