These interrelations are so complicated and at the same time so
important that, in spite of the dangers of repetition, I will consider
them again from another angle. The chronological sequence would
thus be as follows: first, instinct-renunciation due to dread of an
aggression by external authority—this is, of course, tantamount to
the dread of loss of love, for love is a protection against these
punitive aggressions. Then follows the erection of an internal
authority, and instinctual renunciation due to dread of it—that is,
dread of conscience. In the second case, there is the equivalence of
wicked acts and wicked intentions; hence comes the sense of guilt,
the need for punishment. The aggressiveness of conscience carries
on the aggressiveness of authority. Thus far all seems to be clear;
but how can we find a place in this scheme for the effect produced
by misfortune (_i.e._ renunciations externally imposed), for the
effect it has of increasing the rigour of conscience? how account
for the exceptional stringency of conscience in the best men, those
least given to rebel against it? We have already explained both these
peculiarities of conscience, but probably we still have an impression
that these explanations do not go to the root of the matter, and that
they leave something still unexplained. And here at last comes in an
idea which is quite peculiar to psycho-analysis and alien to ordinary
ways of thinking. Its nature enables us to understand why the whole
matter necessarily seemed so confused and obscure to us. It tells us
this: in the beginning conscience (more correctly, the anxiety which
later became conscience) was the cause of instinctual renunciation,
but later this relation is reversed. Every renunciation then becomes a
dynamic fount of conscience; every fresh abandonment of gratification
increases its severity and intolerance; and if we could only bring it
better into harmony with what we already know about the development
of conscience, we should be tempted to make the following paradoxical
statement: Conscience is the result of instinctual renunciation, or:
Renunciation (externally imposed) gives rise to conscience, which then
demands further renunciations.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account