Classics of modern science : $b (Copernicus to Pasteur)
History
Classics of modern science : $b (Copernicus to Pasteur)
Science; Science -- History
There is a consideration which appears at first sight to be opposed to
the admission of our hypothesis with respect to compound substances.
It seems that a molecule composed of two or more elementary molecules
should have its mass equal to the sum of the masses of these molecules;
and that in particular, if in a compound one molecule of one substance
unites with two or more molecules of another substance, the number
of compound molecules should remain the same as the number of
molecules of the first substance. Accordingly, on our hypothesis when
a gas combines with two or more times its volume of another gas, the
resulting compound, if gaseous, must have a volume equal to that of
the first of these gases. Now, in general, this is not actually the
case. For instance, the volume of water in the gaseous state is, as
M. Gay-Lussac has shown, twice as great as the volume of oxygen which
enters into it, or, what comes to the same thing, equal to that of the
hydrogen instead of being equal to that of the oxygen. But a means
of explaining facts of this type in conformity with our hypothesis
presents itself naturally enough: we suppose, namely, that the
constituent molecules of any simple gas whatever (i. e., the molecules
which are at such a distance from each other that they cannot exercise
their mutual action) are not formed of a solitary elementary molecule,
but are made up of a certain number of these molecules united by
attraction to form a single one; and further, that when molecules of
another substance unite with the former to form a compound molecule,
the integral molecule which should result splits up into two or more
parts (or integral molecules) composed of half, quarter, &c., the
number of elementary molecules going to form the constituent molecule
of the first substance, combined with half, quarter, &c., the number of
constituent molecules of the second substance that ought to enter into
combination with one constituent molecule of the first substance (or,
what comes to the same thing, combined with a number equal to this last
of half-molecules, quarter-molecules, &c., of the second substance);
so that the number of integral molecules of the compound becomes
double, quadruple, &c., what it would have been if there had been no
splitting-up, and exactly what is necessary to satisfy the volume of
the resulting gas.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account