Classics of modern science : $b (Copernicus to Pasteur)
History
Classics of modern science : $b (Copernicus to Pasteur)
Science; Science -- History
Is it, however, possible that these distinctions are only secondary,
that the power of crystallization and the plastic power of the cells
are identical, and that an original difference can be demonstrated
between the substance of cells and that of crystals, by which we
may perceive that the substance of cells must crystallize as cells
according to the laws by which crystals are formed, rather than in the
shape of the ordinary crystals? It may be worth while to institute such
an inquiry.
In seeking such a distinction between the substance of cells and that
of crystals, we may say at once that it cannot consist in anything
which the substance of cells has in common with those organic
substances which crystallize in the ordinary form. Accordingly, the
more complicated arrangement of the atoms of the second order in
organic bodies cannot give rise to this difference; for we see in
sugar, for instance, that the mode of crystallization is not altered by
this chemical composition.
Another point of difference by which inorganic bodies are distinguished
from at least some of the organic bodies, is the faculty of imbibition.
Most organic bodies are capable of being infiltrated by water, and
in such a manner that it penetrates not so much into the interspaces
between the elementary tissues of the body, as into the simple
structureless tissues, such as areolar tissue, &c.; so that they form
an homogeneous mixture, and we can neither distinguish particles
of organic matter, nor interspaces filled with water. The water
occupies the infiltrated organic substances, just as it is present in
a solution, and there is as much difference between the capacity for
imbibition and capillary permeation, as there is between a solution and
the phenomena of capillary permeation. When water soaks through a layer
of glue, we do not imagine it to pass through pores, in the common
sense of the term; and this is just the condition of all substances
capable of imbibition. They possess, therefore, a double nature,
they have a definite form like solid bodies; but like fluids, on the
other hand, they are also permeable by anything held in solution. As
a specifically lighter fluid poured on one specifically heavier so
carefully as not to mix with it, yet gradually penetrates it, so also,
every solution, when brought into contact with a membrane already
infiltrated with water, bears the same relations to the membrane, as
though it were a solution. And crystallization being the transition
from the fluid to the solid state, we may conceive it possible, or
even probable, that if bodies, capable of existing in an intermediate
state between solid and fluid could be made to crystallize, a
considerable difference would be exhibited from the ordinary mode of
crystallization. In fact, there is nothing, which we call a crystal,
composed of substance capable of imbibition; and even among organized
substances, crystallization takes place only in those which are capable
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account