Classics of modern science : $b (Copernicus to Pasteur) — John Shaqi
Classics of modern science : $b (Copernicus to Pasteur)
History
Classics of modern science : $b (Copernicus to Pasteur)
Science; Science -- History
SAGR.: Even if universal phenomena which depend upon these
movements could be explained as readily by the one hypothesis as by
the other, yet by the first general impression I would regard as more
unreasonable the view that the whole universe moves; just as if any
one should climb to the top of your dome for the purpose of getting
a view of the city and its environs and then should demand that the
whole region be made to move around him to save him the trouble of
turning his head. In any event, there would have to be great advantages
connected with this theory, which were lacking in the other, in
order that such an absurdity should be balanced and outweighed and
should appear more credible than the opposite opinion. But Aristotle,
Ptolemaus, and Signore Simplicio must find such advantages in their
theory, and I should be glad if we might hear these advantages if they
exist, or if they do not, that some one would explain to me why they do
not and cannot exist.
SALV.: If, in spite of every sort of investigation, I am
able to find no such differences, I believe I have thereby discovered
that such difference does not exist. So in my opinion it is useless
to pursue this further: rather let us proceed. Motion is only so far
motion and acts as such, if it stands in relation to things which lack
motion. In relation to things that are all in the same degree affected
by it, it is as much without effect as if it did not take place. The
wares with which a ship is loaded move, when they depart from Venice
and arrive at Aleppo, passing Korfu, Candia, Cyprus etc; since Venice,
Korfu and Candia remain fixed and do not move with the ship. But in
respect to the bales, chests, and other pieces of baggage which are
on the ship as cargo or ballast, the movement of the ship itself from
Venice to Syria is as good as non-existent, since their position in
relation to one another does not change; and this is due to the fact
that the movement is a common one in which they all take part. If of
the wares on the ship one bale moves only an inch away from the chest,
this is for it a greater movement in relation to the chest, than the
whole journey of 2,000 miles which they undergo in common.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account