Classics of modern science : $b (Copernicus to Pasteur)
History
Classics of modern science : $b (Copernicus to Pasteur)
Science; Science -- History
Therefore, since plainly the motion which many movable bodies undergo
in common is without effect and, with regard to their mutual position
toward one another, it is as if it did not exist, for there is no
change among them; and since it only affects the relative position
of such bodies as do not share in the movement, for in this case the
mutual relation is changed; since we have divided the universe into
two parts, of which one must be movable and the other immovable; then
for all purposes this movement will be of the same effect whether it
is ascribed to the earth alone or to all the rest of the universe. For
the working of such a motion is on nothing but the relative position in
which the earth and the heavenly bodies stand to one another, and aside
from this relative position nothing changes. If now it is indifferent
for accomplishing this result whether the earth alone moves and the
whole universe rests, or the earth rests and the whole universe is
subject to one common movement, who can believe that Nature--who by
common agreement does not employ great means when she can obtain the
same result by smaller ones--would have undertaken to set in motion
an immeasurable number of mighty bodies, and that with incredible
velocity, to accomplish what could be obtained by the moderate motion
of one single body around the center?
SIMPL.: I do not agree that that mighty movement would be as
if it did not happen in regard to the sun, the moon, the innumerable
host of fixed stars. Do you call it nothing that the sun goes from
one meridian to another, rises from one horizon, sinks under another,
brings now day, now night; that the moon goes through similar changes
and likewise the other planets, as well as the fixed stars?
SALV.: All the changes mentioned by you are such only with
respect to the earth. To demonstrate this, only imagine yourself away
from the earth; there is then no rising or setting of the sun, no
horizons, no meridians, no day, no night; in a word, by the movement
mentioned no change in the relation of the moon to the sun or to any
other star is evoked. All these changes have reference to the earth;
they are supposed only because the sun is first visible in China, then
Egypt, Greece, France, Spain, America, and so on, and so also for the
moon and the other heavenly bodies. The same process would occur in
the same way, if, without disturbing so vast a part of the universe,
the earth alone should be revolved.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account