Classics of modern science : $b (Copernicus to Pasteur)
History
Classics of modern science : $b (Copernicus to Pasteur)
Science; Science -- History
It has been, now of a long time, observed by others, that all sorts of
heavy bodies (allowance being made for the inequality of retardation
which they suffer from a small power of resistance in the air) descend
to the earth _from equal heights_ in equal times; and that
equality of times we may distinguish to a great accuracy, by the help
of pendulums. I tried the things in gold, silver, lead, glass, sand,
common salt, wood, water, and wheat. I provided two wooden boxes,
round and equal; I filled the one with wood, and suspended an equal
weight of gold (as exactly as I could) in the centre of oscillation
of the other. The boxes hanging by equal threads of 11 feet made a
couple of pendulums perfectly equal in weight and figure, and equally
receiving the resistance of the air. And, placing the one by the
other, I observed them to play together forwards and backwards, for
a long time, with equal vibrations ... and the like happened in the
other bodies. By these experiments, in bodies of the same weight, I
could manifestly have discovered a difference of matter less than
the thousandth part of the whole, had any such been. But, without
all doubt, the nature of gravity towards the planets is the same
as towards the earth.... Moreover, since the satellites of Jupiter
perform their revolutions in times which observe the sesquiplicate
proportion of their distances from Jupiter’s centre--that is, equal
at equal distances. And, therefore, these satellites, if supposed
to fall _towards Jupiter_ from equal heights, would describe
equal spaces in equal times, in like manner as heavy bodies do on
our earth.... If, at equal distances from the sun, any satellite, in
proportion to the quantity of its matter, did gravitate towards the
sun with a force greater than Jupiter in proportion to his, according
to any given proportion, suppose of _d_ to _e_; then the
distance between the centres of the sun and of the satellite’s orbit
would be always greater than the distance between the centres of the
sun and of Jupiter nearly in the sub-duplicate of that proportion; as
by some computations I have found. And if the satellite did gravitate
towards the sun with a force, lesser in the proportion of _e_ to
_d_, the distance of the centre of the satellite’s orbit from
the sun would be less than the distance of the centre of Jupiter from
the sun in the sub-duplicate of the same proportion. Therefore if, at
equal distances from the sun, the accelerative gravity of any satellite
towards the sun were greater or less than the accelerative gravity of
Jupiter towards the sun but one 1-1000 part of the whole gravity, the
distance of the centre of the satellite’s orbit from the sun would be
greater or less than the distance of Jupiter from the sun by one 1-2000
part of the whole distance--that is, by a fifth part of the distance
of the utmost satellite from the centre of Jupiter; an eccentricity of
the orbit which would be very sensible. But the orbits of the satellite
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account