Washington, George, 1732-1799 -- Military leadership
I don’t know that in the Progress of this Campaign any Thing
has passed which can be reputed an Act of Hostility, or that is
contrary to the Treaties which subsist between the two Crowns;
the Continuation whereof as much interests, and is as pleasing
to us, as the _English_. Had you been pleased, Sir, to have
descended to particularize the Facts which occasioned your
Complaint, I should have had the Honour of answering you in the
fullest, and, I am persuaded, most satisfactory Manner.
I made it my particular Care to receive Mr _Washington_, with a
Distinction suitable to your Dignity, as well as his own
Quality and great Merit. I flatter myself that he will do me
this Justice before you, Sir; and that he will signify to you
in the Manner I do myself, the profound Respect with which I
am,
_SIR_,
Your most humble, and
most obedient Servant,
LEGARDEUR DE ST. PIERE.”
Washington found the Governor’s council was to meet the day following
and that his report was desired. Accordingly he rewrote his _Journal_
from the “rough minutes” he had made. From any point of view this
document of ten thousand words, hastily written by a lad of twenty-one
who had not seen a school desk since his seventeenth year, is far more
creditable and remarkable than any of the feats of physical endurance
for which the lad is idolized by the youthful readers of our school
histories. It is safe to say that many a college bred man of today
could not prepare from rough notes such a succinct and polite document
as did this young surveyor, who had read few books and studied neither
his own nor any foreign language. The author did not “in the least
conceive ... that it would ever be published.” Speaking afterward of
its “numberless imperfections” he said that all that could recommend
it to the public was its truthfulness of fact. Certain features of
this first literary work of Washington’s are worthy of remark: his
frankness, as in criticising Shingiss’ village as a site for a fort as
proposed by the Ohio Company; his exactness in giving details (where
he could obtain them) of forts, men, and guns; his estimates of
distances; his wise conforming to Indian custom; his careful note of
the time of day of important events; his frequent observations of the
kinds of the land through which he passed; his knowlege of Indian
character.
This mission prosecuted with such rare tact and skill was an utter
failure, considered from the standpoint of its nominal purpose. St.
Piere’s letter was firm, if not defiant. Yet Dinwiddie, despairing of
French withdrawal, had secured the information he desired. Already the
French had reached the Forks of the Ohio where an English fort was
being erected. Peaceful measures were exhausted with the failure of
Washington’s embassy.
England’s one hope was--war.
II.
THE STORY OF THE CAMPAIGN.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account