Commentaries on the Surgery of the War in Portugal, Spain, France, and the Netherlands: from the battle of Roliça, in 1808, to that of Waterloo, in 1815; with additions relating to those in the Crimea in 1854-55, showing the improvements made during and since that period in the great art and science of surgery on all the subjects to which they relate.Guthrie, G. J. (George James)
History
Commentaries on the Surgery of the War in Portugal, Spain, France, and the Netherlands: from the battle of Roliça, in 1808, to that of Waterloo, in 1815; with additions relating to those in the Crimea in 1854-55, showing the improvements made during and since that period in the great art and science of surgery on all the subjects to which they relate.
Guthrie, G. J. (George James)
Crimean War, 1853-1856 -- Medical care; Napoleonic Wars, 1800-1815 -- Medical care; Surgery, Military -- Europe -- History; War wounds -- Europe -- History
20. In making incisions for the removal of balls in the vicinity of
large vessels, particularly in the neck, the hand should always be
unsupported, in order to prevent an accident from any sudden movement
of the patient. This caution is the more necessary on the field of
battle, where many things may give rise to sudden alarm. At the affair
of Saca Parte, near Alfaiates, in Portugal, I stationed myself behind
a small watch-tower, and the wounded were first brought to this spot
for assistance. A howitzer had also been placed upon it, being rising
ground, and at the moment I was extracting a ball situated immediately
over the carotid artery, the gun was fired, to the inexpressible alarm
of surgeon, patient, and orderly, who bolted in all directions. From
my hand being unsupported, no mischief ensued, and the operation was
completed as soon as all had recovered their usual serenity. When a
ball is discovered on the opposite side of a limb, through which it
has nearly penetrated, but has not had sufficient power to overcome
the resistance and elasticity of the skin, it should be removed by
incision. An opening is thus obtained for the evacuation of any
matter which may be formed in the long track of such a wound, and
any other extraneous bodies are more readily extracted. When a ball
has penetrated half through the thick part of the thigh, in such a
direction that it cannot readily be removed by the opening at which
it entered; or, from the vicinity of the great vessels, it may be
considered unadvisable to cut for it in that direction; or if the
ball cannot be distinctly felt by the finger through the soft parts,
it ought not to be sought for at the moment, for an incision of
considerable extent will be required to enable the surgeon to extract
it. Much pain will be caused, and higher inflammation may follow than
would ensue if the wound were left to the efforts of nature alone,
by which, in time, the ball would in all probability be brought
much nearer to the surface, and might be more safely extracted. It
frequently happens, that after a few days or weeks, a ball will be
distinctly felt in a spot where the surgeon had before searched for it
in vain. A wound will frequently close without further trouble, the
ball remaining without inconvenience in its new situation; and the
patient not being annoyed by it, does not feel disposed to submit to
pain or inconvenience for its removal. A very strong reason for the
extraction of balls during the first period of treatment, if it can be
safely accomplished, is, that they do not always remain harmless, but
frequently give rise to distressing or harassing pains in or about the
part, which often oblige the sufferer to submit to their extraction at
a later period, when their removal is infinitely more difficult; and
may be more distressing than at the moment of injury.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account