Constantine the Great: The reorganization of the Empire and the triumph of the ChurchFirth, John B. (John Benjamin)
History
Constantine the Great: The reorganization of the Empire and the triumph of the Church
Firth, John B. (John Benjamin)
Church history -- Primitive and early church, ca. 30-600; Constantine I, Emperor of Rome, -337
It was during the winter of 302 that the question was carefully debated
by Diocletian and Galerius—the latter was staying with the senior
Augustus at Nicomedia—whether it was advisable to take repressive
measures against the Christians. According to Lactantius, Galerius
clamoured for blood, while Diocletian represented how mischievous it
would be to throw the whole world into a ferment, and how the Christians
were wont to welcome martyrdom. He argued, therefore, that it would be
quite enough if they purged the court and the army. Then, as neither
would give way, a Council was called, which sided with Galerius rather
than with Diocletian, and it was decided to consult the oracle of Apollo
at Miletus. Apollo returned the strange answer that there were just men
on the earth who prevented him from speaking the truth, and gave that as
the reason why the oracles which proceeded from his tripods were false.
The “just men” were, of course, the Christians. Diocletian yielded, only
stipulating that there should be no bloodshed, while Galerius was for
burning all Christians alive. Such is Lactantius’s story, and it does
credit to Diocletian, inasmuch as it shews his profound reluctance to
disturb the internal peace which his own wise policy had established. As
a propitious day, the Festival of the Terminalia, February 23, 303, was
chosen for the inauguration of the anti-Christian campaign. The church
at Nicomedia was levelled to the ground by the Imperial troops and, on
the following day, an edict was issued depriving Christians of their
privileges as full Roman citizens. They were to be deprived of all their
honours and distinctions, whatever their rank; they were to be liable to
torture; they were to be penalised in the courts by not being allowed to
prosecute for assault, adultery, and theft. Lactantius well says[12]
that they were to lose their liberty and their right of speech. The
penalties extended even to slaves. If a Christian slave refused to
renounce his religion he was never to receive his freedom. The churches,
moreover, were to be destroyed and Christians were forbidden to meet
together. No bloodshed was threatened, as Diocletian had stipulated, but
the Christian was reduced to the condition of a pariah. The edict was no
sooner posted up than, with a bitter jibe at the Emperors, some bold,
indignant Christian tore it down. He was immediately arrested, tortured,
racked, and burnt at the stake. Diocletian had been right. The
Christians made willing martyrs.
-----
Footnote 12:
_Libertatem denique ac vocem non haberent_ (_De Mort. Persec._, c.
13).
-----
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account