Constantine the Great: The reorganization of the Empire and the triumph of the ChurchFirth, John B. (John Benjamin)
History
Constantine the Great: The reorganization of the Empire and the triumph of the Church
Firth, John B. (John Benjamin)
Church history -- Primitive and early church, ca. 30-600; Constantine I, Emperor of Rome, -337
The personal attitude of Diocletian towards religion in general is best
seen in the edict which he issued against the Manichæans. The date is
somewhat uncertain, but it undoubtedly preceded the anti-Christian
edicts. Manichæanism took its rise in Persia, its principal
characteristic being the practice of thaumaturgy, and it spread fast
throughout the East. Diocletian ordered the chiefs of the sect to be
burned to death; their followers were to have their goods confiscated
and to suffer capital punishment unless they recanted; while persons of
rank who had disgraced themselves by joining such a shameful and
infamous set of men were to lose their patrimony and be sent to the
mines. These were savage enactments, and it is important to see how the
Emperor justified them. Fortunately his language is most explicit. “The
gods,” he says, “have determined what is just and true; the wisest of
mankind, by counsel and by deed, have proved and firmly established
their principles. It is not, therefore, lawful to oppose their divine
and human wisdom, or to pretend that a new religion can correct the old
one. To wish to change the institutions of our ancestors is the greatest
of crimes.” Nothing could be clearer. It is the old official defence of
the State religion, that men are not wiser than their fathers, and that
innovation in worship is likely to bring down the wrath of the gods.
Moreover, as the edict points out, this Manichæanism came from Persia,
the traditional enemy of Rome, and threatened to corrupt the “modest and
tranquil Roman people” with the detestable manners and infamous laws of
the Orient. “Modest and tranquil” are not the epithets which posterity
has chosen to apply to the Roman people of the Empire, but Diocletian’s
point is obvious. Manichæanism was a device of the enemy; it must be
poison, therefore, to the good Roman. Such an argument was born of
prejudice rather than of reason; we shall see it applied yet again to
the Christians, and applied even by the Christian Church to its own
schismatics and heretics.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account