Conversations on the Plurality of WorldsFontenelle, M. de (Bernard Le Bovier)
Philosophy
Conversations on the Plurality of Worlds
Fontenelle, M. de (Bernard Le Bovier)
Plurality of worlds
The next morning as soon as the Marchioness was awake, I sent to
enquire how she did, and whether she had been able to sleep whilst the
globe was turning? I received for answer, that she already felt quite
accustomed to the motion; and had slept as undisturbedly as Copernicus
himself. Soon afterwards, some company came to spend the whole day
with her; a tiresome custom which is always observed in the country;
yet long as the visit was, we considered it a great kindness in the
guests, not to prolong it to the next day; which I find is a common
practice in this part of the world: however, as they had the civility
to leave us, the Marchioness and I had the evening to ourselves. We
immediately went to the park and resumed our astronomical conversation.
She understood so perfectly all I had said on the former evening, that
she disdained to hear any repetition of the subject, and desired me
to enter on a new one.--Well then, said I, since the sun, which we
concluded is immovable, can no longer be considered a planet; and the
earth is proved to be one, and to move round the sun; you will be the
less surprised to hear, that the moon is a world like ours; and to all
appearance, inhabited.--I never heard speak of peopling the moon; she
replied, but as a ridiculous, visionary hypothesis.--It may be so,
answered I; I only adopt the interest of any party, in these cases, as
people do in civil wars; in which the uncertainty of the event, induces
them to hold a correspondence with opposite sides, and even, when
possible, with their enemies. For my part, though I believe the moon is
inhabited, I can be very civil to any one that disbelieves it; and I
always retain the power of going over to their side without disgracing
myself, if I found they had the advantage: but in the present state
of the question I have the following reasons for thinking the moon is
inhabited.
Let us suppose that no communication had ever been carried on between
Paris and St. Dennis; and that a Parisian who had never gone out of his
own city should stand on one of the towers of Notre-Dame, and at that
distance view St. Dennis: were he asked if he believed that St. Dennis
was inhabited like Paris, he would without hesitation answer, No; I see
inhabitants in Paris, but I can discover none at St. Dennis, nor did
I ever hear of any being there. Somebody standing by, might answer,
that we certainly cannot see them from the towers of Notre-Dame, but
that is, because we are at too great a distance; that from all we can
discern of St. Dennis it is very much like Paris; that it has steeples,
houses, walls; and therefore is very probably inhabited. All this makes
no impression on our citizen; he insists upon it that St. Dennis is
uninhabited because he does not see any body in it. The moon is our St.
Dennis, and each of us is this Parisian who has never left the city in
which he resides.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account