Corruption in American politics and lifeBrooks, Robert C. (Robert Clarkson)
History
Corruption in American politics and life
Brooks, Robert C. (Robert Clarkson)
Political corruption -- United States; United States -- Social conditions -- 1865-1918
The manœuvring for position between the parties in 1908 which resulted
in the voluntary acceptance by each of high standards of publicity is
too fresh in the public mind to require rehearsal here. For the first
time in the history of presidential elections some definite information
was made available regarding campaign finances. The Republican National
Committee reported contributions of $1,035,368.27. This sum, however,
does not include $620,150 collected in the several states by the
finance committees of the Republican National Committee and turned
over by them to their respective state committees. The Democratic
National Committee reported contributions amounting to $620,644.77. The
list of contributors to the Republican National Fund contained 12,330
names.[76] The Democratic National Committee filed a “list of over
25,000 names representing over 100,000 contributors who contributed
through newspapers, clubs, solicitors, and other organisations, whose
names are on file in the office of the chairman of the Democratic
National Committee at Buffalo.”[77]
On many points, unfortunately, the two reports, while definite to a
degree hitherto unknown, are not strictly comparable. Some species of
“uniform accounting” applicable to this subject is manifestly necessary
before any detailed investigation can be undertaken. One big fact
stands out with sufficient clearness, however, namely that the national
campaign of 1908 was waged at a money cost far below that of the three
preceding campaigns.
Basing his estimate upon what is said to have been spent in 1896,
1900, and 1904, Mr. F. A. Ogg placed the total cost of a presidential
election to both parties, including the state and local contests
occurring at the same time, at $15,000,000.[78] One-third to one-half
of this enormous sum, in his opinion, must be attributed to the
presidential campaign proper. Compared with this estimate of from five
to seven and a half millions the relatively modest total of something
more than two and a quarter millions shown by the figures of 1908 must
be counted a strong argument in favour of publicity.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account