Cosmic symbolism : $b Being a discussion and exposition of some recondite and obscure points in the art of the Kabalists, the mysteries of sound, form and number, and the basic principles of cosmic symbolismSepharial
Religion
Cosmic symbolism : $b Being a discussion and exposition of some recondite and obscure points in the art of the Kabalists, the mysteries of sound, form and number, and the basic principles of cosmic symbolism
Sepharial
Cabala; Occultism; Symbolism; Symbolism of numbers
The mean rate of Equinoctial Precession for the past eighteen centuries
being 50·1´´ per year, we must divide 21° 52´ by this amount of
precession to obtain the year of coincidence. The result is 1571 years,
which, being taken from the present year 1912, gives the year A.D. 341
as that in which the two zodiacs coincided. But by taking the actual
precession for 1912 and the increment for _t_ years where _t_ equals
1571 - 62, or 1509 years, we have the actual precession as equal to 50´´
per year nearly, and 21° 52´ divided by 50´´ is 1574, the years to be
taken from 1912, which gives the year A.D. 338. According to our
estimate of the rate of precession, therefore, the Epoch will vary
between A.D. 338 and 341. In round numbers, therefore, we may regard the
year A.D. 340 as that of the coincidence of the zodiacs, and the number
of years since elapsed multiplied by the mean rate of 50·1´´ will give
the increment known as Ayanámsha for any date since the Epoch.
But I find an entry in the Ephemeris of Kumbakonam to this effect.
“Mean amount of precession at commencement of K.Y. 5014 (A.D. 1912), 22°
27´ 20´´. Rate of precession, 50·26´´.”
Now if we divide the above amount of precession by the rate we shall get
1612 years, which would give the Epoch A.D. 300, whereas, as we have
seen, other data in the Ephemeris lead us to the year A.D. 340. Now I
have checked the Kumbakonam Ephemeris, and find that so far as the Solar
ingresses are concerned they agree with the Nautical Almanac, and there
would therefore appear to be no reasonable doubt that if the true amount
of precession is here given, the true Epoch for the coincidence of the
zodiacs has been found. But I am advised by Dr. V. V. Ramanan that there
is an increment not generally recognized by either the Indian or
European astronomers, but which is nevertheless an essential part of the
calculation. It is that of the progression of the asterisms or
constellations from west to east, along the order of the signs at the
rate of 8´´ per year, to which I have already referred in an extract
from one of his valuable letters. If, therefore, we add this 8´´ to the
annual precession 50·1´´, we shall have 58·1´´ as the total precession
of the Equinoxes on the first point of As’wini, and then if we further
divide the amount of precession for the year 1912 as given in the
Panchángam, namely, 22° 27´ 20´´ by 58·1´´, we shall get 1390 years,
which taken from 1912 yields the year of coincidence A.D. 521.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account