Cosmic symbolism : $b Being a discussion and exposition of some recondite and obscure points in the art of the Kabalists, the mysteries of sound, form and number, and the basic principles of cosmic symbolismSepharial
Religion
Cosmic symbolism : $b Being a discussion and exposition of some recondite and obscure points in the art of the Kabalists, the mysteries of sound, form and number, and the basic principles of cosmic symbolism
Sepharial
Cabala; Occultism; Symbolism; Symbolism of numbers
Newton believed that Chiron was the first to define the constellations
of the heavens, and this also was the opinion of the Greeks. But that is
to give to the mythical centaur a personal reality. It is true that we
may find him, along with his contemporary Hercules, by whose arrow he
met his death, among the constellations, and if it be the fact that the
Greeks exalted their heroes to the stars and shaped the constellations
so as to record their fame for ever, then we can only conclude that
Chiron did not define the constellations of either Sagittarius or
Hercules, whatever may have been his part in the matter so far as the
rest are concerned.
It is further to be observed that long before the period ascribed to the
famous centaur we have mention of the constellations in the Book of Job,
where Arcturus, the Pleiades, Orion and the Mazzaroth are mentioned.
Both Homer and Hesiod mention some of the constellations, but it is
known that Hipparchus, about 150 B.C., defined the limits of forty-eight
of the asterisms, while Ptolemy gave us a complete catalogue. Some
constellations have since been added by Tycho, Helvetius and others. But
from what has already been said on this subject it will be evident that
the mythology and astronomy of the Greeks was closely connected, but
this does not of necessity prove a Greek origin, for we have yet to
determine the origin of the myths. That many of these are shared by the
Assyfians, Aryans, Persians and Egyptians, seems to show that they had a
Chaldean origin. The Chinese have an astronomy which appears to be
unique and without parallel among other nations.
If we go back to the earliest record, the Chinese, we shall find that
they had no week of days, but a cycle of sixty days, and also one of
sixty years. But the days of the month were reckoned from the Moon’s
age, the day of the New Moon being called the first day. Thus we find in
the earliest record such expressions as “the first day of the first moon
he brought things to a conclusion in the temple of his ancestors,” and
“on the first day of the twelfth moon,” etc. Even the great Confucius
gives no hint of any week of seven days. In his Chun-Tsiu he makes such
entries as the following: “In the fifty-eighth year of the cycle and the
third year of the reign of Prince Yiu Kung, in the Spring, on the first
day of the Second Moon, the day being the sixth of the cycle (of sixty
days), the sun was eclipsed.” All his entries are of the same careful
and explicit nature, and expressed in the same terms, that is to say, in
reference to the Cyclic year, the number of the month, the year of the
reigning Prince of Lu, and the day of the cycle of sixty days.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account