Coyotes in Their Economic RelationsLantz, David E. (David Ernest)
Science
Coyotes in Their Economic Relations
Lantz, David E. (David Ernest)
Coyote
Charles W. Richmond, in 1888, wrote to the Survey from Gallatin County.
Mont., relating the following incident:
While we were camped near Bozeman a flock of some 4,000 sheep were
driven by, and night overtook them on some foothills south of Bozeman.
During the night a flock of coyotes entered the ranks and the sheep
stampeded. Many ran over some bluffs, and next morning sheep, dead
and dying, were several feet deep at the foot of the bluffs. Nearly
500 were counted in the pile, and for several days afterwards sheep,
with lacerated ears and torn flanks, wandered into barnyards in the
vicinity. The total number lost must have been heavy.
In parts of the Southwest sheep growers have estimated their losses
from wild animals as equal to 20 percent of the flock. The average loss
reported from several States is 5 percent. In nearly all the States
west of the Mississippi the industry has declined in the past two
years, and one of the principal causes given is losses from coyotes.
At present the industry thrives only in sections where the local
conditions permit the herding of sheep in large flocks--a system highly
injurious to the pasturage.
It is evident that the wealth of any State could be materially
increased if it were possible everywhere to keep small flocks of sheep,
Flocks increase rapidly under favorable conditions and good management,
and the cost of keeping them is small when herders can be dispensed
with. The double product, wool and million, usually places the profit
of handling them above that of cuttle or horses. The gains also come
oftener, since sheep mature in a year, while cattle and horse require
three.
Vernon Bailey, chief field naturalist of the Biological Survey, writing
from Seguin, Tex., under date of November 8, 1904, says:
No sheep are kept in tins part of Texas, and in talking with several
intelligent farmers I find that the reason invariably given is the
abundance of coyotes. The region is occupied by small farms, mainly 80
to 500 acres, on which cotton, corn, sorghum, and vegetables are the
principal crops. There are few if any large stock ranches, but each
farm has its pastures for horses and cattle. These pastures are the
wild land covered with scattered mosquito, post oak, and patches of
chaparral and cactus. The native grasses are abundant and of excellent
quality, and in this mild climate furnish good feed throughout the
year. Many of the pastures are not half eaten down, and the dead and
dry vegetation becomes a nuisance. After harvest cattle and horses are
usually turned into cotton and grain fields, where they do good work
in cleaning up grass and weeds in the field and along the borders.
Still there is abundance of feed constantly going to waste, and a
small flock of sheep could be kept with great profit and no expense on
almost every farm.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account