Crania Ægyptiaca: Or, Observations on Egyptian Ethnography Derived from Anatomy, History and the MonumentsMorton, Samuel George
History
Crania Ægyptiaca: Or, Observations on Egyptian Ethnography Derived from Anatomy, History and the Monuments
Morton, Samuel George
Craniology -- Egypt; Ethnology -- Egypt
Rosellini, M. C., plate XCVII., and Wilkinson’s Topography of
Thebes, p. 109.
Footnote 34:
Rosellini, M. C. Plate 126.
Footnote 35:
Idem. Vol. 1, Plate 4.
Footnote 36:
Idem. M. C. Plate 41.
Footnote 37:
Idem. M. C. Plate 37.
Footnote 38:
Idem. M. C. Plate 86.
Footnote 39:
Idem. M. C. Plate 29.
Footnote 40:
Rosellini, M. C. Plate 132, Fig. 1.
Footnote 41:
Idem. Plate 127, Fig. 1.
Footnote 42:
Trans. Royal Society of London, 1794, passim, and Plate 16, Fig. 2,
of that work.
Footnote 43:
Ancient Egypt, p, 46, 47.
Footnote 44:
The learned Dr. Beke reverses the route, and supposes that the
“Cushite descendants of Ham” first settled on the western side of
the Arabian Peninsula, crossed thence into Ethiopia, and descending
the Nile, became the Egyptians of after times.—Origines Biblicæ, 1,
p. 162.
Footnote 45:
I use the terms Libyan and Ethiopian as they are handed down to us
from antiquity. “Speaking with all the precision I am able,” says
Herodotus, “the country I have been describing is inhabited by four
nations only; of these _two are natives_ and two are strangers. The
natives are the _Libyans_ ([Greek: Dibyes]) and the Ethiopians,
([Greek: Aithiopes]); one of which possesses the northern, the other
the southern parts of Africa. The strangers are the Phoenicians and
the Greeks.”—Melpomene, 197. In the days of Herodotus nomad Libyans
still inhabited the vicinity of Avaris.
Footnote 46:
I use the word _aboriginal_ in this place with some reservation. It
has been supposed by learned authorities that Africa was peopled by
Negroes before the Hamitic tribes entered that country. I do not
suppose Ham to have been the progenitor of the Negro race; and, with
Dr. Wiseman, Mr. Lawrence and many others, I regard as a
“conjecture” in Science, that doctrine which would attribute the
physical gradations between the white man and the Negro to any other
natural process than that of direct amalgamation.—Lawrence, Lectures
on Zoology, 8th edit. p. 264. Wiseman, Lectures, 2d edit. p. 158.
Beke, Origines Biblicæ, Tom. I., p. 162.
Footnote 47:
These Letters, which are addressed to Peter S. Duponceau, Esq., are
contained in the fourth volume of the Transactions of this Society;
and to this source the reader is referred for a mass of interesting
details which is necessarily excluded in this place. The valuable
communications of Mr. Shaler, also addressed to Mr. Duponceau, are
published in the second volume of the same work.
Footnote 48:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account